Therapeutic effects of plasma exchange and red blood cell transfusion following white blood cell filtration on patients with AIHA
-
摘要: 目的:比较血浆置换与去白细胞红细胞悬液输血对自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)患者治疗效果。方法:选择2018年2月—2020年5月诊治的AIHA患者104例,随机分为置换组(50例)和输血组(54例),其中置换组给予血浆置换治疗,输血组给予去白细胞红细胞悬液输血治疗。比较2组患者治疗前后凝血功能:凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)和凝血酶时间(TT);纤溶功能:纤溶酶原(Plg)、D-二聚体(D-D)、纤溶酶原激活物抑制物-1(PAI-1);不良反应:发热反应、过敏反应以及输血性紫癜。评估2组疗效和安全性。结果:2组患者治疗有效率比较差异无统计学意义(96.00%vs 88.89%,P>0.05);治疗前2组患者PT、APTT、TT、Plg、DD和PAI-1水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后输血组患者PT、APTT、TT和Plg水平均显著高于置换组,DD和PAI-1水平显著低于置换组(P<0.05);输血组发热反应、过敏反应以及输血性紫癜总发生率明显低于置换组(3.70%vs 16.00%,P<0.05)。结论:去白细胞红细胞悬液输血与血浆置换应用于AIHA患者治疗均具有较好的效果,但去白细胞红细胞悬液输血对于患者的凝血-纤溶功能改善效果更好,同时输血安全性更高。
-
关键词:
- 血浆置换 /
- 去白细胞红细胞悬液输血 /
- 凝血功能 /
- 自身免疫性溶血性贫血
Abstract: Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects of plasma exchange and red blood cell transfusion following white blood cell filtration on the patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia(AIHA).Methods: A total of 104 patients with AIHA admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to May 2020 were enrolled and randomly divided into exchange group(50 cases, plasma exchange) and transfusion group(54 cases, red blood cell transfusion following white blood cell filtration). The coagulation function(prothrombin time[PT], activated partial thromboplastin time[APTT], thrombin time[TT])and fibrinolytic function(plasminogen[Plg], D-dime[DD], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1[PAI-1]) before and after treatment, and adverse reactions(fever, allergic reactions and transfusion induced purpura) were compared between the two groups. The curative effect and safety in both groups were evaluated.Results: There was no significant difference in the response rate between the two groups(96.00% vs. 88.89%, P>0.05). There were no significant differences in PT, APTT, TT, Plg, DD and PAI-1 levels between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05). After treatment, PT, APTT, TT and Plg levels in the transfusion group were significantly higher than those in the exchange group, while levels of DD and PAI-1 were significantly lower than those in the exchange group(P<0.05). The total incidence of fever, allergic reactions and transfusion induced purpura in the transfusion group was significantly lower than that in the exchange group(3.70% vs. 16.00%, P<0.05).Conclusion: Both red blood cell transfusion following white blood cell filtration and plasma exchange may be effective in the treatment of AIHA patients. However, the former can better improve the patients' coagulation-fibrinolysis function, with higher safety. -
[1] 张秋会,胡兴斌,安群星,等.多种红细胞抗原相合性输血在自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者中的临床应用[J].临床血液学杂志,2020,33(2):87-89.
[2] Hill QA,Hill A,Berentsen S.Defining autoimmune hemolytic anemia:a systematic review of the terminology used for diagnosis and treatment[J].Blood Adv,2019,3(12):1897-1906.
[3] Barcellini W,Fattizzo B,Zaninoni A.Current and emerging treatment options for autoimmune hemolytic anemia[J].Expert Rev Clin Immunol,2018,14(10):857-872.
[4] 李宇红,邵晓珊,蒋新辉.血浆置换治疗儿童自身免疫性溶血性贫血专家共识解读[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2018,33(15):1144-1147.
[5] 郑强.去白细胞红细胞悬液输血及自体血液回输在非溶血性发热性输血反应中的临床应用[J].武警后勤学院学报(医学版),2015,24(11):886-888.
[6] 中华医学会血液学分会红细胞疾病(贫血)学组.自身免疫性溶血性贫血诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2017年版)[J].中华血液学杂志,2017,38(4):265-267.
[7] 金伟媚,江锦红,方炳木.利妥昔单抗联合常规治疗自身免疫性溶血性贫血的疗效观察[J].药物流行病学杂志,2017,26(04):230-233.
[8] Chen C,Wang L,Han B,et al.Autoimmune hemolytic anemia in hospitalized patients:450 patients and their red blood cell transfusions[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2020,99(2):e18739.
[9] 阎羽欣,陈广洁.适应性免疫细胞在自身免疫性溶血性贫血发病机制中的研究进展[J].中国免疫学杂志,2020,36(11):1392-1396.
[10] 李玖平,陈利红,杨浩莹.自身免疫性溶血性贫血对输血前血型鉴定、抗体筛查及交叉配血的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(9):199-201.
[11] Anani W,Wucinski J,Baumann Kreuziger L,et al.Therapeutic plasma exchange in refractory warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia[J].Transfusion,2017,57(6):1336.
[12] 李宇红,邵晓珊,新辉.血浆置换治疗儿童自身免疫性溶血性贫血专家共识解读[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2018,33(15):1144-1147.
[13] 马会敏,史景莉,许秀兰,等.红细胞悬液中致热源性细胞因子对非溶血性发热性输血反应发生的影响[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2017,27(11):1566-1568.
计量
- 文章访问数: 702
- PDF下载数: 245
- 施引文献: 0