免疫炎性指标和淋巴细胞亚群在初诊多发性骨髓瘤预后判断中的意义

安然, 陈钰, 张苏江, 等. 免疫炎性指标和淋巴细胞亚群在初诊多发性骨髓瘤预后判断中的意义[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(3): 168-173. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.03.004
引用本文: 安然, 陈钰, 张苏江, 等. 免疫炎性指标和淋巴细胞亚群在初诊多发性骨髓瘤预后判断中的意义[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(3): 168-173. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.03.004
AN Ran, CHEN Yu, ZHANG Sujiang, et al. Significance of immuno-inflammatory indexes and lymphocyte subsets in the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(3): 168-173. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.03.004
Citation: AN Ran, CHEN Yu, ZHANG Sujiang, et al. Significance of immuno-inflammatory indexes and lymphocyte subsets in the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(3): 168-173. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.03.004

免疫炎性指标和淋巴细胞亚群在初诊多发性骨髓瘤预后判断中的意义

  • 基金项目:
    上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院院基金(No:2020ZY08)
详细信息

Significance of immuno-inflammatory indexes and lymphocyte subsets in the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

More Information
  • 目的 探讨免疫炎性指标和淋巴细胞亚群在初诊多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者预后判断中的作用。方法 回顾性分析2018年6月—2019年12月我院血液科收治的NDMM患者的临床资料,包括免疫炎性指标中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值(LMR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)以及不同淋巴细胞亚群水平,对其临床特征、治疗反应和预后情况进行分析。结果 ① 共纳入70例NDMM患者,中位发病年龄64(37~78)岁,男女比例1.9∶1.0;不同ISS及R-ISS分期的患者LMR水平比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.018、0.004),而NLR、PLR及外周血淋巴细胞亚群水平比较差异无统计学意义。②分别以各免疫炎性指标的中位数作为cut-off值将患者分为高低2组,结果显示高NLR组总缓解率明显低于低NLR组(54.3% vs 82.9%,P=0.010),而高LMR组、高CD3+T细胞表达组及高NK细胞表达组总缓解率分别为91.4%、80.6%及82.9%,明显高于低水平组的45.9%、55.9%及54.3%(P<0.001、P=0.026和P=0.010)。③70例患者的疗效均可评估,总缓解率为68.6%(48/70),19例疾病进展患者中8例使用以达雷妥尤单抗为基础的联合化疗,结果显示达雷妥尤单抗治疗前后外周血淋巴细胞亚群变化差异无统计学意义。④单因素分析显示,ISS分期、R-ISS分期、β2-微球蛋白、LMR、PLR、CD3+CD8+百分比、CD4/CD8比值是患者总生存的影响因素(P<0.05);多因素分析显示,R-ISS分期(HR=8.001,95%CI2.222~28.812,P=0.001)、CD4/CD8比值(HR=3.875,95%CI1.005~14.946,P=0.049)是影响患者总生存的独立危险因素。⑤根据患者伴有不良预后因素的免疫指标(LMR、PLR、CD3+CD8+百分比、CD4/CD8比值)个数,将患者分为伴有0或1个、2个和≥3个预后不良因素组,3组间总生存时间比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.000 3)。结论 免疫炎性指标和外周血淋巴细胞亚群可反映机体免疫状态,在一定程度上对NDMM患者的预后判断有价值,值得临床深入研究。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  不同ISS及R-ISS分期LMR比较

    图 2  伴有不同数量预后不良因素的初诊MM患者OS比较

    表 1  初诊MM患者不同水平免疫生物标志物疗效比较

    因素 例数 ORR(48例) sCR/CR(17例) 因素 例数 ORR(48例) sCR/CR(17例)
    例(%) P 例(%) P 例(%) P 例(%) P
    NLR 0.010 0.403 CD3+CD8+ 0.091 0.409
      <2.34 35 29(82.9) 10(28.6)   <26.0% 31 18(58.1) 9(29.0)
      ≥2.34 35 19(54.3) 7(20.0)   ≥26.0% 39 30(76.9) 8(20.5)
    LMR <0.001 0.050 CD4/CD8 <0.001 0.073
      <2.73 35 16(45.9) 5(14.3)   正常 55 46(83.6) 16(29.1)
      ≥2.73 35 32(91.4) 12(34.3)   ≤1 15 2(13.3) 1(6.7)
    PLR 0.122 0.403 CD3-CD19+ 1.000 0.780
      <116.50 35 21(60.0) 10(28.6)   <5.4% 35 24(68.6) 9(25.7)
      ≥116.50 35 27(77.1) 7(20.0)   ≥5.4% 35 24(68.6) 8(22.9)
    CD3+ 0.026 0.679 NK 0.010 0.403
      <74.0% 34 19(55.9) 9(26.5)   <14.3% 35 19(54.3) 7(20.0)
      ≥74.0% 36 29(80.6) 8(22.2)   ≥14.3% 35 29(82.9) 10(28.6)
    CD3+CD4+ 0.607 0.403
      <42.5% 35 23(65.7) 7(20.0)
      ≥42.5% 35 25(71.4) 10(28.6)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  8例使用达雷妥尤单抗治疗前后外周血淋巴细胞亚群水平比较 M(范围)

    组别 CD3+/% CD3+CD4+/% CD3+CD8+/% CD4/CD8 CD3-CD19+/% NK/%
    治疗前 75(50~90) 44.0(31~55) 24(17~100) 0.66(0.16~1.43) 3.45(1.90~11.90) 19.35(6.10~32.80)
    治疗后 76(45~96) 28.5(20~66) 33(24~48) 0.60(0.27~2.54) 1.75(0.40~3.80) 18.65(1.20~29.40)
    Z -0.421 -0.981 -1.120 -0.560 -1.859 -0.700
    P 0.674 0.326 0.263 0.575 0.063 0.484
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  影响初诊MM患者OS的单因素及多因素分析

    因素 单因素分析 多因素分析
    HR(95%CI) P HR(95%CI) P
    年龄(<65岁vs ≥65岁) 2.642(0.571~12.730) 0.214
    ISS分期(Ⅰ/Ⅱ期vs Ⅲ期) 5.993(1.282~28.005) 0.023
    R-ISS分期(Ⅰ/Ⅱ期vs Ⅲ期) 13.240(3.930~44.605) <0.001 8.001(2.222~28.812) 0.001
    Hb(<115 g/L vs ≥115 g/L) 0.413(0.053~3.229) 0.400
    Cr(<177 μmol/L vs ≥177 μmol/L) 3.104(0.894~10.775) 0.074
    ALB(<35 g/L vs ≥35 g/L) 0.807(0.238~2.734) 0.731
    Ca2+(<2.55 mmol/L vs ≥2.55 mmol/L) 0.773(0.099~6.053) 0.807
    LDH(<245 U/L vs ≥245 U/L) 2.704(0.535~8.031) 0.291
    β2-MG(<5.5 mg/L vs ≥5.5 mg/L) 4.819(1.260~18.430) 0.022
    NLR(<2.34 vs ≥2.34) 2.174(0.630~7.505) 0.219
    LMR(<2.73 vs ≥2.73) 0.211(0.046~0.977) 0.047
    PLR(<116.50 vs ≥116.50) 0.171(0.036~0.801) 0.025
    CD3+(<74.0% vs ≥74.0%) 0.530(0.155~1.819) 0.313
    CD3+CD4+(<42.5% vs ≥42.5%) 2.515(0.713~8.876) 0.152
    CD3+CD8+(<26.0% vs ≥26.0%) 0.239(0.062~0.920) 0.037
    CD4/CD8(≤1 vs正常) 7.809(2.283~26.710) <0.001 3.875(1.005~14.946) 0.049
    CD3-CD19+(<5.4% vs ≥5.4%) 0.941(0.286~3.101) 0.920
    NK(<14.3% vs ≥14.3%) 1.594(0.465~5.460) 0.458
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management[J]. Am J Hematol, 2020, 95(5): 548-567. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25791

    [2]

    Lemaire M, Deleu S, De Bruyne E, et al. The microenvironment and molecular biology of the multiple myeloma tumor[J]. Adv Cancer Res, 2011, 110: 19-42.

    [3]

    De Raeve HR, Vanderkerken K. The role of the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2005, 20(4): 1227-1250.

    [4]

    Adams-Huet B, Jialal I. The neutrophil count is superior to the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker of inflammation in nascent metabolic syndrome[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 2019, 56(6): 715-716. doi: 10.1177/0004563219866221

    [5]

    张林, 陈玥, 张宝红. 血小板-淋巴细胞比率、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率及红细胞分布宽度在冠心病严重程度中的诊断价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2020, 36(9): 824-827. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXB202009010.htm

    [6]

    乾叶子, 杨威, 吕媛媛, 等. N端脑钠肽前体、可溶性人基质裂解素2及血小板/淋巴细胞比值对慢性心力衰竭的诊断价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2021, 37(3): 239-243. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXB202103011.htm

    [7]

    Krenn-Pilko S, Langsenlehner U, Thurner EM, et al. The elevated preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients[J]. Br J Cancer, 2014, 110(10): 2524-2530. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.163

    [8]

    Diem S, Schmid S, Krapf M, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio(PLR)as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)treated with nivolumab[J]. Lung Cancer, 2017, 111: 176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.024

    [9]

    Lee SF, Ng TY, Spika D. Prognostic value of lymphocyte-monocyte ratio at diagnosis in Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 338. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5552-1

    [10]

    Stefaniuk P, Szymczyk A, Podhorecka M. The Neutrophil to Lymphocyte and Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratios as New Prognostic Factors in Hematological Malignancies-A Narrative Review[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2020, 12: 2961-2977. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S245928

    [11]

    Belotti A, Doni E, Bolis S, et al. Peripheral blood lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts outcome in follicular lymphoma and in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the rituximab era[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2015, 15(4): 208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.10.001

    [12]

    中国医师协会血液科医师分会, 中华医学会血液学分会, 中国医师协会多发性骨髓瘤专业委员会. 中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2020年修订)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59(5): 341-346. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200304-00179

    [13]

    Pessoa DMR, Vidriales MB, Paiva B, et al. Analysis of the immune system of multiple myeloma patients achieving long-term disease control by multidimensional flow cytometry[J]. Haematologica, 2013, 98(1): 79-86. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.067272

    [14]

    朱成斌, 蔡春莲. 血常规指标对初诊多发性骨髓瘤临床分期和预后预测价值的研究[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2021, 34(10): 723-727. http://lcxz.cbpt.cnki.net/WKC/WebPublication/paperDigest.aspx?paperID=017072ce-7cb9-428d-ae01-fb6bc3b30c5e

    [15]

    Romano A, Laura PN, Cerchione C, et al. The NLR and LMR ratio in newly diagnosed MM patients treated upfront with novel agents[J]. Blood Cancer J, 2017, 7(12): 649. doi: 10.1038/s41408-017-0019-6

    [16]

    Kelkitli E, Atay H, Cilingir F, et al. Predicting survival for multiple myeloma patients using baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio[J]. Ann Hematol, 2014, 93(5): 841-846. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1978-8

    [17]

    Shi L, Qin X, Wang H, et al. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and decreased platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(12): 18792-18801. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13320

    [18]

    Joshua D, Suen H, Brown R, et al. The T Cell in Myeloma[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2016, 16(10): 537-542. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.08.003

    [19]

    Huang LQ, Wang JX, He K, et al. Analysis of peripheral blood T-cell subsets and regulatory T-cells in multiple myeloma patients[J]. Cell Mol Biol(Noisy-le-grand), 2018, 64(5): 113-117. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2018.64.5.19

    [20]

    Pittari G, Vago L, Festuccia M, et al. Restoring Natural Killer Cell Immunity against Multiple Myeloma in the Era of New Drugs[J]. Front Immunol, 2017, 8: 1444. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01444

    [21]

    Kawano Y, Roccaro AM, Ghobrial IM, et al. Multiple Myeloma and the Immune Microenvironment[J]. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 2017, 17(9): 806-818.

    [22]

    许婷, 唐亚男, 何月茹, 等. NK细胞及调节性T细胞在多发性骨髓瘤中的表达水平及其意义[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2020, 33(3): 187-190. http://lcxz.cbpt.cnki.net/WKC/WebPublication/paperDigest.aspx?paperID=bcdb4b01-8a28-4b88-a77c-7866afd5710a

    [23]

    Koike M, Sekigawa I, Okada M, et al. Relationship between CD4(+)/CD8(+)T cell ratio and T cell activation in multiple myeloma: reference to IL-16[J]. Leuk Res, 2002, 26(8): 705-711. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2126(01)00192-8

    [24]

    朱明霞, 万文丽, 王晶, 等. 45例多发性骨髓瘤患者细胞免疫功能变化及其临床意义[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2014, 35(12): 1053-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2014.12.002

    [25]

    Pick M, Vainstein V, Goldschmidt N, et al. Daratumumab resistance is frequent in advanced-stage multiple myeloma patients irrespective of CD38 expression and is related to dismal prognosis[J]. Eur J Haematol, 2018, 100(5): 494-501. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13046

  • 加载中

(2)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1393
  • PDF下载数:  775
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-09-08
修回日期:  2022-01-12
刊出日期:  2022-03-01

目录