《基于骨髓样本的多发性骨髓瘤微小残留病灶检测专家共识(2024年版)》解读

傅琤琤. 《基于骨髓样本的多发性骨髓瘤微小残留病灶检测专家共识(2024年版)》解读[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2024, 37(9): 607-611. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.003
引用本文: 傅琤琤. 《基于骨髓样本的多发性骨髓瘤微小残留病灶检测专家共识(2024年版)》解读[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2024, 37(9): 607-611. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.003
FU Chengcheng. Interpretation of expert consensus on minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma based on bone marrow samples(2024)[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2024, 37(9): 607-611. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.003
Citation: FU Chengcheng. Interpretation of expert consensus on minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma based on bone marrow samples(2024)[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2024, 37(9): 607-611. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.003

《基于骨髓样本的多发性骨髓瘤微小残留病灶检测专家共识(2024年版)》解读

详细信息
    作者简介:

    傅琤琤,苏州大学附属第一医院副教授、主任医师,任国家血液系统疾病临床医学研究中心副主任、中华医学会血液分会浆细胞学组副组长、中国医师协会血液分会骨髓瘤专家委员会委员、中国抗癌协会血液肿瘤分会委员、女医师协会靶向治疗专委会委员、江苏省医师协会血液分会委员、江苏省抗癌学会血液肿瘤分会/江苏省医学会血液分会/江苏省研究型医院协会浆细胞疾病学组副组长、中国医药教育协会血液学专业委员会常务委员、亚太骨髓瘤网成员和国际骨髓瘤协会成员。作为项目负责人先后获江苏省卫生厅科教兴卫重点人才基金、国家自然科学基金、江苏省自然科学基金、中国抗癌协会血液肿瘤专业委员会基金。近年来在国内外杂志发表文章100余篇,其中第一作者和通讯作者30余篇。获得过教育部、科技部科技进步二等奖,江苏省新技术引进奖等。

    通讯作者: 傅琤琤,E-mail:fuchengchengsz@163.com
  • 中图分类号: R733.3

Interpretation of expert consensus on minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma based on bone marrow samples(2024)

More Information
  • 多发性骨髓瘤(multiple myeloma,MM)是血液系统第二大常见恶性肿瘤,标准的整体治疗模式及新药为主的方案极大地改善了MM患者的生存,但微小残留病灶(minimal residual disease,MRD)的存在可导致绝大多数患者的复发。目前,二代流式细胞术(next-generation flow cytometry,NGF)和二代测序(next-generation sequencing,NGS)是基于骨髓样本检测MM患者MRD的主流技术。为了推进MM患者MRD检测技术的标准化和规范化,中华医学会血液学分会实验诊断学组及浆细胞疾病学组、中国医师协会多发性骨髓瘤专业委员会讨论制订了在MM患者中应用NGF和NGS技术进行MRD检测的中国专家共识。为更好地指导临床实践,本文拟对共识的临床和实验室部分进行解读。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Meseha M, Hoffman J, Kazandjian D, et al. Minimal residual disease-adapted therapy in multiple myeloma: current evidence and opinions[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2024 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01537-2.Epub ahead of print.

    [2]

    Oliva S, Genuardi E, Belotti A, et al. Multiparameter flow cytometry(MFC)and next generation sequencing(NGS)for minimal residual disease(MRD)evaluation: Results of the FORTE trial in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma(MM)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(15_suppl): 8533. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8533

    [3]

    Costa LJ, Chhabra S, Medvedova E, et al. Minimal residual disease response-adapted therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma(MASTER): final report of the multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Haematol, 2023, 10(11): e890-e901. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00236-3

    [4]

    Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Anderson KC, et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma[J]. Blood Adv, 2020, 4(23): 5988-5999. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827

    [5]

    Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2017, 3(1): 28-35. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160

    [6]

    Lahuerta JJ, Paiva B, Vidriales MB, et al. Depth of response in multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of three PETHEMA/GEM clinical trials[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(25): 2900-2910. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517

    [7]

    Wood B, Jevremovic D, Béné MC, et al. Validation of cell-based fluorescence assays: practice guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS-part V-assay performance criteria[J]. Cytometry B Clin Cytom, 2013, 84(5): 315-323. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21108

    [8]

    Flores-Montero J, de Tute R, Paiva B, et al. Immunophenotype of normal vs myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma[J]. Cytometry B Clin Cytom, 2016, 90(1): 61-72. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21265

    [9]

    Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Paiva B, et al. Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma[J]. Leukemia, 2017, 31(10): 2094-2103. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.29

    [10]

    Stetler-Stevenson M, Paiva B, Stoolman L, et al. Consensus guidelines for myeloma minimal residual disease sample staining and data acquisition[J]. Cytometry B Clin Cytom, 2016, 90(1): 26-30. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21249

    [11]

    Keeney M, Halley JG, Rhoads DD, et al. Marked variability in reported minimal residual disease lower level of detection of 4 hematolymphoid neoplasms: a survey of participants in the college of American pathologists flow cytometry proficiency testing program[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2015, 139(10): 1276-1280. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0543-CP

    [12]

    Flanders A, Stetler-Stevenson M, Landgren O. Minimal residual disease testing in multiple myeloma by flow cytometry: major heterogeneity[J]. Blood, 2013, 122(6): 1088-1089. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-506170

    [13]

    Briney B, Inderbitzin A, Joyce C, et al. Commonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 393-397. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0879-y

    [14]

    Rustad EH, Misund K, Bernard E, et al. Stability and uniqueness of clonal immunoglobulin CDR3 sequences for MRD tracking in multiple myeloma[J]. Am J Hematol, 2019, 94(12): 1364-1373. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25641

    [15]

    Lohr JG, Stojanov P, Carter SL, et al. Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy[J]. Cancer Cell, 2014, 25(1): 91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.015

    [16]

    Wierda WG, Rawstron A, Cymbalista F, et al. Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations[J]. Leukemia, 2021, 35(11): 3059-3072. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01241-1

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  282
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-05-28
刊出日期:  2024-09-01

返回顶部

目录