Retrospective case-control study of ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion and identical type red blood cells transfusion
-
摘要: 目的:通过回顾性病例对照研究探讨ABO及RhD的配合型输注与同型输注红细胞的临床输血效果以及安全性评价,为临床输血方案选择提供依据。方法:随机选取2017-01-01—2019-06-30在山东大学齐鲁医院进行过ABO及RhD配合型输注红细胞的患者为病例组,同期进行ABO及RhD同型输注红细胞的患者为对照组,根据病例组患者的年龄、性别、红细胞输血量、输血时间以及所患疾病等特点匹配对照组。通过本院输血管理系统查询输注前及输注后24 h、48 h的Hb、RBC、Hct,采用重复测量方差方法分析病例组与对照组之间2种不同输血方案(ABO及RhD的配合型输注红细胞与同型输注红细胞)对患者的Hb、RBC、Hct影响有无显著差别以及输注红细胞前后2组患者的Hb、RBC、Hct有无显著差别,并分析这2种因素之间是否存在交互作用。通过分析病例组与对照组在输注红细胞前及输注后1 d、3 d、7 d、15 d的间接胆红素(IBiL)、因输注红细胞而新产生不规则抗体、新产生DAT阳性、输血不良反应等指标评价其临床输注安全性。结果:病例组与对照组在年龄、性别、红细胞输血量以及疾病分布等方面均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);病例组与对照组的输注红细胞有效性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与输注红细胞前相比,病例组与对照组在输注红细胞后(24 h及48 h)的Hb、RBC、Hct与各自输注前相比均差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),各自输注红细胞后24 h与48 h相比均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);病例组与对照组的2种不同输注红细胞方案对患者的Hb、RBC、Hct影响差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);红细胞不同输注方案与输注前后这2种因素之间不存在交互作用(P>0.05),即输注前与输注后的Hb、RBC、Hct均不随患者进行ABO及RhD的配合型输注红细胞或同型输注红细胞变化而变化。2组患者的IBiL在输注红细胞前及输注后1 d、3 d、7 d、15 d均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。无因本次输注红细胞而产生新不规则抗体、新产生DAT阳性及出现不良输血反应的病例。结论:ABO及RhD配合型输注与同型输注红细胞同样安全有效,配合型输注红细胞在抢救某些危重患者生命及某些疾病治疗方面具有重要临床意义。Abstract: Objective:To explore the validity and safety of ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion and identical type red blood cell transfusion by retrospective case-control study in order to provide basis for selection of clinical blood transfusion. Method:The patients who were conducted ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion from January 1,2017 to June 30,2019 in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were selected randomly and defined them as the case group.The patients who were transfused identical type red blood cell were also selected randomly and defined them as the control group.Matched the case group and the control group according to the patients’ characteristics such as age,gender,volume of red blood cells transfusion and transfusion time as well as the distribution of diseases.Inquired about the results of patients’ Hb,RBC and Hct pre-transfusion and posttransfusion in 24 hours and 48 hours through the hospital’s blood transfusion management system and analyzed whether there were significant differences or not of the influence in Hb,RBC and Hct not only the two different red blood cell transfusion schemes(ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion and identical type transfusion)but also the time of red blood cells transfusion as well as the interaction between them by repeated measurement variance analysis.Evaluated the safety of red blood cells transfusion by comparing the results of indirect bilirubin(IBiL)pretransfusion and 1 d,3 d,7 d and 15 days after transfusion,new irregular antibodies emerged and patients of DAT positive as well as adverse reactions caused by red blood cells transfusion in the study between the case group and its control group. Result:There was no significant difference between the case group and control group in age,gender,volume of red blood cells transfusion and distribution of disease(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the validity of the two different red blood cell transfusion schemes between the case group and control group.There were significant differences of the influence in the results of HB,RBC and Hct for posttransfusion(24 and 48 hours)comparing with that of the pre-transfusion for the case group and the control group respectively(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the 24 hours and 48 hours after red blood cells transfusion for the two groups respectively(P>0.05),as well as there was no significant difference in HB,RBC and Hct(P>0.05)between the two groups.No interaction among pre-transfusion,posttransfusion and the two different red cell blood transfusion schemes was found(P>0.05),in other words,the influence of pre-transfusion or posttransfusion in Hb,RBC and Hct did not change whether either red blood cell transfusion scheme was performed,ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion or identical type transfusion.There was on significant difference of IBiL not only pre-transfusion but also posttransfusion in 1 d,3 d,7 d and 15 days(P>0.05)and the result was applicable to that between the control group and the case group(P>0.05)similarly.No irregular antibody emerged and patients of DAT positive as well as adverse transfusion reaction caused by this ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion and identical type red blood cell transfusion was found in this study.Conclusion:ABO and RhD matched type red blood cells transfusion is safe and effective as that of identical type red blood cells transfusion,which might play an important role in saving the lives of critically ill patients and in the treatment of some diseases.
-
Key words:
- matched type red blood cell transfusion /
- case-control study /
- interaction
-
[1] 梅礼军,陈葳.同型与配合型输血对红细胞不规则抗体产生的对照研究[J].东南国防医药,2018,20(2):156-159.
[2] 于洋,孙晓琳,马春娅,等.61例自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者血型血清学特征及输血疗效评估[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2013,21(5):1275-1279.
[3] 中华医学会临床输血学分会,中国医师协会输血科医师分会.特殊情况紧急抢救输血推荐方案[J].中国输血杂志,2014,27(1):1-3.
[4] 付永水,钱开诚,陆志刚,等.临床输血[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[5] 王华玲.同型输血与配合型输血对红细胞不规则抗体的影响比较[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(24):4456-4458.
[6] Flommersfeld S,Mand C,Kühne CA,et al.Unmatched Type O RhD+Red Blood Cells in Multiple Injured Patients[J].Transfus Med Hemother,2018,45:158-161.
[7] 高峰.临床输血与检验[M].北京:人民卫生出版社:150-151.
[8] 胡志颖,赖圣明.应用配合型输血紧急抢救RhD新生儿溶血病的效果探析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2017,1(14):108-109.
[9] 王霞,李文璨,孙涛.A2B亚型输血相容性检测及输血方案选择[J].当代医学,2015,21(13):53-54.
[10] Hèzouwè Jean Magnang,Ayimba E,Lochina Fétéké,et al.The ABO-RhD matched red blood cell transfusion,source of alloantigens occurrence in recipients[J].Int J Adv Res,2014,2:40-48.
[11] 孙福廷,王立萍.IgG抗-c引起迟发型溶血反应及血浆置换治疗1例[J].临床血液学杂志,2015,28(8):732-733,737.
计量
- 文章访问数: 97
- PDF下载数: 149
- 施引文献: 0