Analysis of clinical characteristics and coagulation status in patients with aspirin resistant polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia
-
摘要: 目的:探讨阿司匹林抵抗的真性红细胞增多症(PV)和原发性血小板增多症(ET)患者的临床特点及凝血功能。方法:收集2019年6月—2021年4月于中国中医科学院西苑医院血液科门诊就诊的骨髓增殖性肿瘤患者63例(PV 21例,ET 42例),按照花生四烯酸抑制率,将患者分为阿司匹林抵抗(AR)组(43例)与阿司匹林敏感(AS)组(20例),对2组患者临床特征(性别、年龄、阿司匹林是否规律服用、合并症、基因突变、血细胞计数)和凝血功能进行分析。结果:63例患者AR发生率为68.3%(43/63),其中ET患者AR发生率显著高于PV患者(81.0% vs 42.9%,P<0.05)。与AS组比较,AR组女性、不规律口服阿司匹林、有驱动基因突变患者所占比例显著增多(P<0.05),血红蛋白与红细胞比容显著降低(P<0.05),血小板计数与血小板压积显著升高(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,女性患者(OR=5.657,95%CI 1.368~23.390)和有驱动基因突变的患者(OR=7.250,95%CI 1.420~37.028)发生AR的风险更高(P<0.05)。凝血状态方面,与AS组比较,AR组纤维蛋白降解产物显著降低(P<0.05),R值与K值显著缩短(P<0.05),α角、MA值及CI显著升高(P<0.05),其余指标差异无统计学意义。结论:ET患者AR发生率明显高于PV患者。女性和有驱动基因突变的患者发生AR的风险较高。与发生AS的PV和ET患者比较,发生AR的PV和ET患者处于相对高凝状态。Abstract: Objective: To explore the clinical characteristics and coagulation function of patients with aspirin-resistant polycythemia vera(PV) and essential thrombocythemia(ET).Methods: A total of 63 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms from June 2019 to April 2021 in our hospital were collected, including 21 cases of PV and 42 cases of ET. According to the inhibition rate of arachidonic acid, patients were divided into aspirin resistance(AR) group(43 cases) and aspirin sensitive(AS) group(20 cases). The clinical characteristics(gender, age, whether aspirin was taken regularly, comorbidities, gene mutations, blood cell count) and coagulation function of patients in the two groups were analyzed.Results: The incidence of AR in 63 patients was 68.3%(43/63). The incidence of AR in patients with ET was significantly higher than that in patients with PV(81.0% vs 42.9%, P<0.05). Compared with the AS group, the proportion of women, irregular oral aspirin, and driver gene mutations in the AR group was significantly increased(P<0.05), hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly reduced(P<0.05), and the platelet count and platelet crit were significantly increased(P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that female patients(OR=5.657, 95%CI 1.368-23.390) and patients with driver gene mutations(OR=7.250, 95%CI 1.420-37.028) had a higher risk of AR(P<0.05). In terms of coagulation status, compared with the AS group, fibrinogen degradation product in AR group was significantly reduced(P<0.05), and R value was significantly decreased, K value was significantly shortened(P<0.05), α angle, MA value and CI were significantly increased(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other indicators.Conclusion: The incidence of AR in ET patients is significantly higher than that in PV patients. Women and patients with driver gene mutations have a higher risk of AR. Compared with PV and ET patients with AS, PV and ET patients with AR are in a relatively hypercoagulable state.
-
[1] Vainchenker W, Kralovics R.Genetic basis and molecular pathophysiology of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms[J].Blood, 2017, 129(6):667-679.
[2] Martin K.Risk factors for and management of MPN-associated bleeding and thrombosis[J].Curr Hematol Malig Rep, 2017, 12(5):389-396.
[3] Jing Y, Yue X, Yang S, et al.Association of aspirin resistance with increased mortality in inschemicstroke[J].J Nutr Health Aging, 2019, 23(3):266-270.
[4] Olechowski B, Ashby A, Mariathas M, et al.Is arachidonic acid stimulation really a test for the response to aspirin? Time to think again?[J].Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2017, 15(1):35-46.
[5] Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Cervantes F, et al.Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms:ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J].Ann Oncol, 2015, 26 Suppl 5:v85-v99.
[6] 刘苗苗, 郭涛.骨髓增殖性肿瘤血栓事件的治疗现状[J].临床血液学杂志, 2021, 34(1):9-12.
[7] Gremmel T, Gisslinger B, Gisslinger H, et al.Response to aspirin therapy in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms depends on the platelet count[J].Transl Res, 2018, 200(10):35-42.
[8] Gillet B, Ianotto JC, Mingant F, et al.Multiple Electrode Aggregometry is an adequate method for aspirin response testing in myeloproliferative neoplasms and differentiates the mechanisms of aspirin resistance[J].Thromb Res, 2016, 142:26-32.
[9] 李虓, 张丽敏, 孙越红, 等.急性缺血性脑卒中患者阿司匹林抵抗的风险因素分析[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2020, 41(17):2100-2103, 2111.
[10] 陈翔, 李广站, 王玉琴, 等.脑梗死患者抗血小板药物抵抗高危因素分析[J].南通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(4):377-379.
[11] 雷瑚仪, 韩素芳.阿司匹林对老年原发性血小板增多症血小板活化及血液流变学的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2015, 25(11):94-96.
[12] Pich A, Riera L, Francia DCP, et al.JAK2 V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations and bone marrow histology in patients with essential thrombocythaemia[J].Acta Haematol, 2018, 140(4):234-239.
[13] Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Larson DR, et al.Long-term survival and blast transformation in molecularly annotated essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis[J].Blood, 2014, 124(16):2507-2513, 2615.
[14] 周梦迪, 陈垦, 李勇, 等.血清FABP3水平与冠状动脉病变及阿司匹林抵抗的关系[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2019, 35(4):348-352.
[15] Perrier-Cornet A, Ianotto JC, Mingant F, et al.Decreased turnover aspirin resistance by bidaily aspirin intake and efficient cytoreduction in myeloproliferative neoplasms[J].Platelets, 2017, 29(7):723-728.
[16] 郭平平, 陈晓霞, 王晓蓉, 等.阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抗血小板抵抗机制及临床治疗研究进展[J].中国临床神经科学, 2019, 27(3):321-328.
[17] 荆鹿超, 孙瑞红.阿司匹林抵抗机制的研究[J].脑与神经疾病杂志, 2017, 25(10):657-660.
[18] 庞军, 吴强, 张钲, 等.中国人群血小板抵抗与血小板糖蛋白受体基因相关性的荟萃分析[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2019, 35(1):10-14.
[19] Yalcinkaya E, Celik M.Evaluation of inflammatory conditions associated with aspirin resistance[J].Ups J Med Sci, 2014, 119(3):292-293.
计量
- 文章访问数: 483
- PDF下载数: 330
- 施引文献: 0