288例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者临床特点及预后分析

阿孜古丽·麦合麦提, 陈菲菲, 任雨虹, 等. 288例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者临床特点及预后分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(1): 21-28. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.005
引用本文: 阿孜古丽·麦合麦提, 陈菲菲, 任雨虹, 等. 288例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者临床特点及预后分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(1): 21-28. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.005
CHEN Feifei, REN Yuhong, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of 288 patients with follicular lymphoma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(1): 21-28. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.005
Citation: CHEN Feifei, REN Yuhong, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of 288 patients with follicular lymphoma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(1): 21-28. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.005

288例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者临床特点及预后分析

详细信息

Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of 288 patients with follicular lymphoma

More Information
  • 目的 探讨滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者的临床特点及预后相关因素。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月—2020年6月复旦大学附属中山医院血液科住院治疗的288例初诊FL患者的临床资料,分析其临床特点、生存及预后因素。结果 ① 中位年龄55岁,男141例,女147例。FL 1~2级占58.3%,FL 3A级占24.7%,FL 3B级占3.5%,复合FL占9.7%,其他(分级不明)占3.8%。83.7%住院治疗FL患者处于Ⅲ~Ⅳ期,41.7%骨髓受侵。②系统治疗总有效率为89.7%,完全缓解(CR)率为70.4%;24.1%患者2年内复发进展。③R-CHOP样组生存分析显示,3年总生存(OS)率为94.4%,3年无进展生存(PFS)率为71.5%;FL 1~3A级患者,终末疗效CR组和部分缓解(PR)组3年OS率分别为98.7%和96.3%(P=0.935),3年PFS率分别为79.4%和70.5%(P=0.284);FL 1~3A级患者,维持治疗组和非维持治疗组3年OS率分别为100.0%和98.1%(P=0.145),3年PFS率分别为88.4%和68.5%(P=0.040);FL 3B级及复合FL患者,维持治疗组和非维持治疗组3年OS率分别为100.0%和85.7%(P=0.308),3年PFS率分别为53.6%和81.3%(P=0.338)。④R-CHOP样组多因素分析发现,FL 3B级及复合FL(P< 0.001)和ECOG评分≥1分(P=0.005)是OS的独立危险因素;ECOG评分≥1分是PFS的独立危险因素(P=0.022)。结论 FL多见于中老年人,接受R-CHOP样方案患者总体预后好。FL 1~3A级患者,终末疗效达CR和PR生存差异无统计学意义,维持治疗PFS获益,OS无明显获益;而FL 3B级和复合FL患者维持治疗可能无明显获益。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  184例R-CHOP样组患者生存分析

    图 2  R-CHOP样方案治疗后CR组与PR组生存比较

    图 3  R-CHOP样治疗后维持治疗与生存分析

    表 1  288例FL患者的基线特征  例(%)

    临床特征 总体(288例) 系统治疗组(242例) 观察等待组(40例) 放疗组(6例)
    中位年龄(范围)/岁 55(21~85) 54(21~84) 55(34~85) 65(37~80)
    男性 141(49.0) 108(44.6) 28(70.0) 5(83.3)
    年龄≥ 60岁 108(37.5) 85(35.1) 19(47.5) 4(66.7)
    组织学分级
        1~2级 168(58.3) 126(52.1) 37(92.5) 5(83.3)
        3A级 71(24.7) 68(28.1) 3(7.5) 0
        3B级 10(3.5) 10(4.1) 0 0
        FL合并DLBCL 28(9.7) 27(11.2) 0 1(16.7)
        其他 11(3.8) 11(4.5) 0 0
    Ann Arbor Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 241(83.7) 204(84.3) 36(90.0) 1(16.7)
    ECOG评分≥2分 48(16.7) 44(18.2) 3(7.5) 1(16.7)
    合并B症状 75(26.0) 73(30.2) 2(5.0) 0
    血红蛋白 < 120 g/L 77(26.7) 69(28.5) 6(15.0) 2(33.3)
    LDH升高 57(19.8) 53(21.9) 4(10.0) 0
    血β2-MG升高 154(53.5) 143(59.1) 10(25.0) 1(16.7)
    HBs-Ag阳性 36(12.5) 33(13.6) 3(7.5) 0
    骨髓受侵 120(41.7) 109(45.0) 11(27.5) 0
    淋巴结区域>4 193(67.0) 165(68.2) 26(65.0) 2(33.3)
    大肿物(直径>6 cm) 83(28.8) 83(34.3) 0 0
    结外器官受侵≥2 78(27.1) 76(31.4) 2(5.0) 0
    FLIPI(273例)
        低-中危(0~2分) 153(56.0) 128(55.4) 21(58.3) 4(66.7)
        高危(3~5分) 120(44.0) 103(44.6) 15(41.7) 2(33.3)
    FLIPI-2(269例)
        低-中危(0~2分) 166(61.7) 133(57.8) 28(84.8) 5(83.3)
        高危(3~5分) 103(38.3) 97(42.2) 5(15.2) 1(16.7)
    PRIMA预后指数(268例)
        低-中危(0~1分) 182(67.9) 149(64.8) 29(87.9) 4(80.0)
        高危(2分) 86(32.1) 81(35.2) 4(12.1) 1(20.0)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  242例患者的一线治疗方案和终末疗效评估  例(%)

    一线治疗方案 可评估的例数/总例数 ORR CR PR SD+PD
    “无化疗”方案
        利妥昔单抗单药 2/2 2(100.0) 2(100.0) 0 0
        利妥昔单抗+来那度胺 21/22 19(90.5) 10(47.6) 9(42.9) 2(9.5)
    免疫化疗
        利妥昔单抗+CHOP样方案 177/184 162(91.5) 130(73.4) 32(18.1) 15(8.5)
        利妥昔单抗+苯达莫司汀 5/5 5(100.0) 5(100.0) 0 0
        利妥昔单抗+氟达拉滨+环磷酰胺/米托蒽醌+泼尼松 6/6 4(66.7) 4(66.7) 0 2(33.3)
        利妥昔单抗+克拉屈滨 4/4 4(100.0) 3(75.0) 1(25.0) 0
    单纯化疗
        CHOP样方案 17/18 12(70.6) 9(52.9) 3(17.7) 5(29.4)
        氟达拉滨+环磷酰胺 1/1 1(100.0) 1(100.0) 0 0
    合计 233/242 209(89.7) 164(70.4) 45(19.3) 24(10.3)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  184例R-CHOP样组患者预后的单因素分析

    变量 3年PFS率/% P 3年OS率/% P
    组织分级 0.053 < 0.001
        1~3A级 72.4 99.0
        3B级+复合FL 61.9 77.1
    ECOG评分 0.014 0.043
        ≥1分 63.5 91.6
        0分 78.1 96.4
    B症状 0.320 0.088
        有 69.1 89.8
        无 72.2 96.2
    血红蛋白 0.091 0.011
         < 120 g/L 65.2 86.5
        ≥120 g/L 76.0 97.3
    LDH 0.398 0.002
        升高 72.1 84.1
        正常 73.0 97.4
    β2-MG 0.244 0.047
        升高 72.5 92.0
        正常 72.2 97.9
    骨髓受侵 0.022 0.310
        是 63.2 93.4
        否 80.6 95.0
    受累淋巴结区域>4 0.014 0.485
        是 65.4 93.9
        否 78.1 95.6
    结外器官受侵≥2 0.017 0.135
        是 61.4 91.0
        否 76.3 96.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  184例R-CHOP样组患者预后的多因素分析

    变量 PFS OS
    HR(95%CI) P HR(95%CI) P
    FL 3B级+复合FL 23.40(5.05~108.31) < 0.001
    ECOG评分≥1分 2.01(1.11~3.65) 0.022 8.34(1.88~36.96) 0.005
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Teras LR, Desantis CE, Cerhan JR, et al. 2016 US lymphoid malignancy statistics by World Health Organization subtypes[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(6): 443-459. doi: 10.3322/caac.21357

    [2]

    李小秋, 李甘地, 高子芬, 等. 中国淋巴瘤亚型分布: 国内多中心性病例10002例分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2012, 11(2): 111-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDLS201202007.htm

    [3]

    周立强, 李晔雄, 孙云田, 等. 非霍奇金淋巴瘤1125例临床病理分析[J]. 癌症进展, 2006, 4(5): 391-397. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1535.2006.05.004

    [4]

    Batlevi CL, Sha F, Alperovich A, et al. Follicular lymphoma in the modern era: survival, treatment outcomes, and identification of high-risk subgroups[J]. Blood Cancer J, 2020, 10(7): 74. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00340-z

    [5]

    Engelhard M. Anti-CD20 antibody treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphomas[J]. Clin Immunol, 2016, 172: 101-104. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.08.011

    [6]

    Provencio M, Sabin P, Gomez-Codina J, et al. Impact of treatment in long-term survival patients with follicular lymphoma: A Spanish Lymphoma Oncology Group registry[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(5): e0177204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177204

    [7]

    Casulo C, Byrtek M, Dawson KL, et al. Early Relapse of Follicular Lymphoma After Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone Defines Patients at High Risk for Death: An Analysis From the National LymphoCare Study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(23): 2516-2522. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7534

    [8]

    Al-Tourah AJ, Gill KK, Chhanabhai M, et al. Population-based analysis of incidence and outcome of transformed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(32): 5165-5169. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.0283

    [9]

    Wagner-Johnston ND, Link BK, Byrtek M, et al. Outcomes of transformed follicular lymphoma in the modern era: a report from the National LymphoCare Study(NLCS)[J]. Blood, 2015, 126(7): 851-857. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621375

    [10]

    Ambinder AJ, Shenoy PJ, Malik N, et al. Exploring risk factors for follicular lymphoma[J]. Adv Hematol, 2012, 2012: 626035.

    [11]

    Sabattini E, Bacci F, Sagramoso C, et al. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues in 2008: an overview[J]. Pathologica, 2010, 102(3): 83-87.

    [12]

    Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(27): 3059-3068. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800

    [13]

    Junlen HR, Peterson S, Kimby E, et al. Follicular lymphoma in Sweden: nationwide improved survival in the rituximab era, particularly in elderly women: a Swedish Lymphoma Registry study[J]. Leukemia, 2015, 29(3): 668-676. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.251

    [14]

    王楠, 许彭鹏, 王黎, 等. 利妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗229例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的预后研究[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2019, 40(1): 46-51.

    [15]

    吕柯冰, 李鑫, 左伟莉, 等. 不同年龄组低级别滤泡淋巴瘤的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(16): 811-816. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.16.804

    [16]

    Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(27): 3048-3058. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229

    [17]

    Gallamini A, Borra A. FDG-PET Scan: a new Paradigm for Follicular Lymphoma Management[J]. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis, 2017, 9(1): e2017029. doi: 10.4084/mjhid.2017.029

    [18]

    孙悦, 许宏, 郭振清, 等. 探索18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax, SUVsum及病理Ki67表达等在非霍奇金淋巴瘤中的临床应用价值[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2021, 34(1): 18-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXZ202101005.htm

    [19]

    Fisher RI, Leblanc M, Press OW, et al. New treatment options have changed the survival of patients with follicular lymphoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(33): 8447-8452. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1674

    [20]

    Rajai H, Bodor C, Balogh Z, et al. Impact of the reactive microenvironment on the bone marrow involvement of follicular lymphoma[J]. Histopathology, 2012, 60(6B): E66-E75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04187.x

    [21]

    Sorigue M, Sancho JM. Current prognostic and predictive factors in follicular lymphoma[J]. Ann Hematol, 2018, 97(2): 209-227. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3154-z

    [22]

    Lopci E, Zanoni L, Chiti A, et al. FDG PET/CT predictive role in follicular lymphoma[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2012, 39(5): 864-871. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2079-y

    [23]

    卢可, 韩雪, 张会来. 早期复发进展滤泡性淋巴瘤的预后及危险因素分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(7): 344-349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZL202007006.htm

    [24]

    Bachy E, Brice P, Delarue R, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma in the prerituximab era: effect of response quality on survival-A study from the groupe d'etude des lymphomes de l'adulte[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(5): 822-829. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7819

    [25]

    Bachy E, Seymour JF, Feugier P, et al. Sustained Progression-Free Survival Benefit of Rituximab Maintenance in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma: Long-Term Results of the PRIMA Study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(31): 2815-2824. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01073

    [26]

    Zhou Y, Qin Y, He X, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic analysis of advanced stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: A China single-center retrospective study[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 2021, 17(3): 289-299.

  • 加载中

(3)

(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1871
  • PDF下载数:  1058
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-08-08
刊出日期:  2022-01-01

目录