治疗前血浆纤维蛋白原水平在弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后判断中的价值

黄豪博, 黄晓玲, 范丽萍, 等. 治疗前血浆纤维蛋白原水平在弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后判断中的价值[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(1): 58-62. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.011
引用本文: 黄豪博, 黄晓玲, 范丽萍, 等. 治疗前血浆纤维蛋白原水平在弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后判断中的价值[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(1): 58-62. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.011
HUANG Haobo, HUANG Xiaoling, FAN Liping, et al. Value of plasma fibrinogen level before treatment in prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(1): 58-62. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.011
Citation: HUANG Haobo, HUANG Xiaoling, FAN Liping, et al. Value of plasma fibrinogen level before treatment in prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(1): 58-62. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.01.011

治疗前血浆纤维蛋白原水平在弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后判断中的价值

  • 基金项目:
    福建省自然科学基金资助(No:2020J01992);福建省科技创新联合资金项目(No:2019Y9050);福建省医学创新课题(No:2018-CXB-7,2019-CX-15)
详细信息
    通讯作者: 付丹晖,E-mail:fudanhui@189.cn
  • 中图分类号: R733.4

Value of plasma fibrinogen level before treatment in prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

More Information
  • 目的 探讨治疗前血浆纤维蛋白原(Fib)水平在初治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者预后判断中的价值。方法 回顾性分析符合入选标准的389例初治DLBCL患者治疗前血浆Fib水平与患者临床病理特征及预后的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线确定治疗前血浆Fib截断值,按截断值将患者分为Fib高水平组(245例)和Fib低水平组(144例)。比较2组患者临床病理特征、总生存期(OS)及疾病无进展生存期(PFS)的差异,单因素和多因素回归分别分析初治DLBCL患者临床病理特征与预后的关系。结果 治疗前血浆Fib高水平组DLBCL患者中,血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平高于正常上限、Ann Arbor分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ、B症状、更高的国际预后指数(IPI)和NCCN-IPI评分的患者比例显著高于Fib低水平组。LDH水平高于正常、ECOG评分2~4分、Ann Arbor分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ、结外侵犯部位>1处、Fib高水平的初治DLBCL患者的OS、PFS较其他患者更短。多因素分析显示,LDH水平高于正常、ECOG评分2~4分是初治DLBCL患者OS的独立不良预后因子,LDH水平高于正常、结外侵犯部位>1处是初治DLBCL患者PFS的独立不良预后因子,治疗前血浆Fib高水平不是初治DLBCL患者OS、PFS的独立不良预后因子。结论 治疗前血浆Fib高水平与初治DLBCL患者不良预后相关,但并不是独立不良预后因子。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  ROC曲线分析治疗前血浆Fib水平

    图 2  不同治疗前血浆Fib水平的DLBCL患者生存曲线

    表 1  治疗前血浆Fib水平与患者临床特征的关系  

    特征 Fib水平 P
    Fib低水平组
    (144例)
    Fib高水平组
    (245例)
    年龄 0.66
        >60岁 48 88
        ≤60岁 96 157
    性别 1.00
        男 87 147
        女 57 98
    LDH水平 < 0.01
        >正常上限 52 139
        正常 92 106
    ECOG评分 0.26
        0~1分 116 185
        2~4分 28 60
    Ann Arbor分期 0.04
        Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 63 81
        Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 81 164
    结外病灶 0.27
        >1 43 88
        ≤1 101 157
    B症状 0.02
        无 117 172
        有 27 73
    IPI评分 0.02
        低危(0~1分) 69 82
        低中危(2分) 33 55
        高中危(3分) 26 62
        高危(4~5分) 16 46
    NCCN-IPI评分 0.01
        低危(0~1分) 38 41
        低中危(2~3分) 67 101
        高中危(4~5分) 26 79
        高危(≥6分) 13 24
    细胞亚型 0.49
        生发中心 52 94
        非生发中心 83 142
        不能分类 9 9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  影响DLBCL患者OS的单因素和多因素分析

    特征 单因素分析 多因素分析
    风险比(95%CI) P 风险比(95%CI) P
    年龄(>60岁vs ≤60岁) 0.60(0.35~1.03) 0.06
    性别(男vs女) 1.21(0.71~2.06) 0.49
    B症状(有vs无) 2.60(1.53~4.43) < 0.01
    LDH水平(>正常上限vs正常) 4.68(2.41~9.06) < 0.01 3.72(1.87~7.40) < 0.01
    ECOG评分(2~4 vs 0~1) 3.26(1.92~5.55) < 0.01 2.20(1.26~3.82) < 0.01
    Ann Arbor分期(Ⅲ~Ⅳ vs Ⅰ~Ⅱ) 2.83(1.43~5.63) < 0.01
    结外病灶(>1 vs ≤1) 2.15(1.27~3.66) < 0.01
    细胞亚型(生发中心vs非生发中心) 1.67(0.90~3.09) 0.11
    Fib水平(高vs低) 2.22(1.17~4.21) 0.02
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  影响DLBCL患者PFS的单因素和多因素分析

    特征 单因素分析 多因素分析
    风险比(95%CI) P 风险比(95%CI) P
    年龄(>60岁vs ≤60岁) 1.37(0.89~2.10) 0.16
    性别(男vs女) 1.08(0.71~1.65) 0.71
    B症状(有vs无) 1.51(0.97~2.36) 0.07
    LDH水平(>正常上限vs正常) 2.52(1.61~3.92) < 0.01 2.17(1.37~3.44) < 0.01
    ECOG评分(2~4 vs 0~1) 2.24(1.45~3.45) < 0.01
    Ann Arbor分期(Ⅲ~Ⅳ vs Ⅰ~Ⅱ) 2.49(1.49~4.19) < 0.01
    结外病灶(>1 vs ≤1) 2.14(1.41~3.25) < 0.01 1.73(1.12~2.66) 0.01
    细胞亚型(生发中心vs非生发中心) 1.50(0.95~2.39) 0.09
    Fib水平(高vs低) 1.69(1.06~2.70) 0.03
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Li S, Young KH, Medeiros LJ. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Pathology, 2018, 50(1): 74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.09.006

    [2]

    Sehn LH, Gascoyne RD. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: optimizing outcome in the context of clinical and biologic heterogeneity[J]. Blood, 2015, 125(1): 22-32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-577189

    [3]

    Barrans SL, Crouch S, Care MA, et al. Whole genome expression profiling based on paraffin embedded tissue can be used to classify diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and predict clinical outcome[J]. Br J Haematol, 2012, 159(4): 441-453. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12045

    [4]

    Crump M, Neelapu SS, Farooq U, et al. Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study[J]. Blood, 2017, 130(16): 1800-1808. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620

    [5]

    Salles G, Barrett M, Foà R, et al. Rituximab in B-cell hematologic malignancies: a review of 20 years of clinical experience[J]. Adv Ther, 2017, 34(10): 2232-2273. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0612-x

    [6]

    Zhang K, Xu Y, Tan S, et al. The association between plasma fibrinogen levels and lung cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(11): 4492-4500. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.13

    [7]

    Lin Y, Liu Z, Qiu Y, et al. Clinical significance of plasma D-dimer and fibrinogen in digestive cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44(10): 1494-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.052

    [8]

    Sun Y, Zhang Y, Huang Z, et al. Combination of preoperative plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil-to-nymphocyte ratio(the F-NLR score)as a prognostic marker of locally advanced rectal vancer following preoperative chemoradiotherapy[J]. World J Surg, 2020, 44(6): 1975-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05407-3

    [9]

    Wang Z, Fan H, Wang W, et al. High preoperative plasma fibrinogen independently predicts a poor prognosis in patients with nonmetastatic RCC[J]. J Cancer, 2020, 11(9): 2401-2407. doi: 10.7150/jca.40961

    [10]

    Li X, Shu K, Zhou J, et al. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer as prognostic biomarkers for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2020, 18(1): 11-19.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.025

    [11]

    Wu M, Pan Y, Jia Z, et al. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin score is an independent prognostic factor for resectable stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ gastric cancer[J]. Dis Markers, 2019, 2019: 9060845.

    [12]

    Troppan KT, Melchardt T, Wenzl K, et al. The clinical significance of fibrinogen plasma levels in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2016, 69(4): 326-330. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203356

    [13]

    Niu JY, Tian T, Zhu HY, et al. Hyperfibrinogenemia is a poor prognostic factor in diffuse large B cell lymphoma[J]. Ann Hematol, 2018, 97(10): 1841-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3382-x

    [14]

    Shehata AMF, Aldesoky AI, Gohar SF. Plasma fibrinogen level as possible prognostic biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Hematology, 2019, 24(1): 103-107. doi: 10.1080/10245332.2018.1519932

    [15]

    Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(5): 579-586. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2403

    [16]

    Ayers EC, Li S, Medeiros LJ, et al. Outcomes in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma after intensive frontline treatment failure[J]. Cancer, 2020, 126(2): 293-303. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32526

    [17]

    徐卫, 梁金花. 弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤新基因分型及分子靶向的治疗进展[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2020, 33(9): 594-598. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXZ202009002.htm

    [18]

    邵奕, 唐善浩, 陆滢, 等. R-CHOP方案治疗大包块和(或)结外多部位累及的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者2年疗效和安全性观察[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2020, 33(7): 481-492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCXZ202007010.htm

    [19]

    Abdol Razak NB, Jones G, Bhandari M, et al. Cancer-associated thrombosis: an overview of mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2018, 10(10): 380.

    [20]

    Sahni A, Simpson-Haidaris PJ, Sahni SK, et al. Fibrinogen synthesized by cancer cells augments the proliferative effect of fibroblast growth factor-2(FGF-2)[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2008, 6(1): 176-183.

  • 加载中

(2)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2181
  • PDF下载数:  1012
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-04-02
刊出日期:  2022-01-01

目录