阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉治疗老年急性髓系白血病患者临床疗效分析

杨莉莉, 王淑君, 胡婉贞, 等. 阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉治疗老年急性髓系白血病患者临床疗效分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(7): 512-516. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.012
引用本文: 杨莉莉, 王淑君, 胡婉贞, 等. 阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉治疗老年急性髓系白血病患者临床疗效分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(7): 512-516. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.012
YANG Lili, WANG Shujun, HU Wanzhen, et al. Clinical analysis of azacitidine combined with venetoclax in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(7): 512-516. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.012
Citation: YANG Lili, WANG Shujun, HU Wanzhen, et al. Clinical analysis of azacitidine combined with venetoclax in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(7): 512-516. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.012

阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉治疗老年急性髓系白血病患者临床疗效分析

详细信息
    通讯作者: 张文静,E-mail:wenzi-z@163.com
  • 中图分类号: R733.71

Clinical analysis of azacitidine combined with venetoclax in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

More Information
  • 目的 分析阿扎胞苷联合Bcl-2抑制剂维奈克拉治疗老年急性髓系白血病(AML)的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2018年5月—2021年8月本院收治的68例老年AML患者的临床资料,根据治疗方案不同分为2组:使用阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉治疗的患者设为观察组(30例); 使用阿扎胞苷联合半量预激方案化疗的患者设为对照组(38例)。分别对2组患者的疗效、化疗不良反应进行比较。结果 2个疗程诱导治疗结束后进行疗效评价,观察组的完全缓解率和总有效率均显著高于对照组(63.3% vs 36.8%、76.6% vs 52.6%,P< 0.05);观察组血小板恢复时间及中性粒细胞恢复时间均明显短于对照组(P< 0.05);2组患者治疗后CD3+T淋巴细胞、CD4+T淋巴细胞计数均明显低于治疗前(P< 0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义。中位随访时间18(5~25)个月,观察组中位生存时间为17.00(95%CI13.53~20.46)个月,对照组中位生存时间为12.00(95%CI10.00~14.00)个月,观察组中位生存时间较对照组明显延长(P< 0.05)。血液学不良反应方面,2组患者间Ⅲ~Ⅳ级中性粒细胞减少发生率、Ⅲ~Ⅳ级血小板减少发生率和Ⅲ~Ⅳ级中性粒细胞减少伴感染发生率比较差异无统计学意义。非血液学不良反应方面,2组患者间胃肠道不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义; 观察组出现1例肿瘤溶解综合征,经水化、碱化等综合治疗后好转,诱导化疗期间无患者死亡。结论 与阿扎胞苷联合半量预激方案化疗比较,阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉方案提高了老年AML患者的完全缓解率和总有效率,缩短了化疗后血小板及中性粒细胞的恢复时间,明显延长了患者的中位生存时间,且未明显增加血液学及非血液学不良反应,老年患者可耐受,具有明显优势。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  2组患者基本临床资料比较

    临床特征 观察组(30例) 对照组(38例) P
    男∶女/例 18∶12 24∶14 0.79
    年龄/岁 68.13±7.42 67.82±5.55 0.83
    ECOG评分/例(%) 0.85
       1 9(30.0) 13(34.2)
       2 13(43.3) 17(44.7)
       3 8(26.7) 8(21.1)
    FAB分型/例(%) 0.85
       M1 2(6.7) 1(2.6)
       M2 16(53.3) 23(60.5)
       M4 2(6.7) 3(7.9)
       M5 7(23.3) 9(23.7)
       M6 3(10.0) 2(5.3)
    分子遗传学/例(%) 0.81
       低危 9(30.0) 12(31.6)
       中危 11(36.7) 16(42.1)
       高危 10(33.3) 10(26.3)
    白细胞计数/(×109·L-1) 5.21(2.80~15.70) 8.50(2.90~21.30) 0.26
    骨髓原始细胞比例/% 42.82±19.39 42.10±17.91 0.86
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  2组治疗前后免疫功能指标变化 x±S

    组别 CD3+T淋巴细胞/% CD4+T淋巴细胞/%
    治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
    观察组(30例) 66.1±13.4 56.1±12.71) 47.4±11.1 41.7±10.31)
    对照组(38例) 67.5±12.3 58.2±11.61) 50.0±9.9 42.9±7.41)
    与同组治疗前比较,1)P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    李秋柏, 吴迪. 老年急性髓系白血病诊治进展[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2021, 34(5): 308-313. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=znUxuWmAUtfnHwYx5u6NQUZiaJNNleAkCYjECVIrIT9HUGYYNVV56Ys7YjcH0E_SEfOuyjuhn_-91l6uV6eTwLc4MdhLx6slJlEvcwpdwKOZPvWaPbYtxw7MBa0jt7cR&uniplatform=NZKPT

    [2]

    Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry[J]. Blood, 2008, 113(18): 4179-4187.

    [3]

    Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase Ⅲ trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(21): 2670-2677. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9429

    [4]

    Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, et al. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs con ventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with>30% blasts[J]. Blood, 2015, 126(3): 291-300. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664

    [5]

    Al-Ali HK, Jaekel N, Junghanss C, et al. Azacitidine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia medically unfit for or resistant to chemotherapy: a multicenter phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ study[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2012, 53(1): 110-117. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.606382

    [6]

    Huang J, Hong M, Zhu Y, et al. Decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin is as effective as standard dose chemotherapy in the induction treatment for patients aged from 55 to 69 years old with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2018, 59(11): 2570-2579. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1443328

    [7]

    Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, et al. Results of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study of azacitidine(AZA)vs conventional care regimens(CCR)in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia(AML)[J]. Haematologica, 2014, 99: 788-789. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.093724

    [8]

    Lever JR, Fergason-Cantrell EA. Allosteric modulation of sigma receptors by BH3 mimetics ABT-737, ABT-263(Navitoclax)and ABT-199(Venetoclax)[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2019, 142: 87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.040

    [9]

    Invernizzi R, Pecci A, Bellotti L, et al. Expression of p53, bcl-2 and ras oncoproteins and apoptosis levels in acute leukaemias and myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2001, 42(3): 481-489. doi: 10.3109/10428190109064605

    [10]

    Pan R, Hogdal LJ, Benito JM, et al. Selective BCL-2 Inhibition by ABT-199 Causes On-Target Cell Death in Acute Myeloid Leukemia[J]. Cancer Discov, 2014, 4(3): 362-375. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0609

    [11]

    Konopleva M, Pollyea DA, Potluri J, et al. Efficacy and Biological Correlates of Response in a Phase Ⅱ Study of Venetoclax Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia[J]. Cancer Discov, 2016, 6(10): 1106-1117. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0313

    [12]

    Dinardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, et al. Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(7): 617-629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012971

    [13]

    Zhang Y, Asghari HH, Chan O, et al. Hypomethylating agent and venetoclax combination therapy yields superior outcomes when compared to hypomethylating agent monotherapy in patients ≥ 70 years with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Blood, 2019, 134 Suppl 1: 1368.

    [14]

    Dinardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Blood, 2019, 133(1): 7-17. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-868752

    [15]

    Winters AC, Gutman JA, Purev E, et al. Real-world experience of venetoclax with azacitidine for untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Blood Adv, 2019, 3(20): 2911-2919. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000243

    [16]

    Guerra VA, Dinardo C, Konopleva M, et al. Venetoclax-based Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2019, 32(2): 145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2019.05.008

    [17]

    Aldoss I, Yang D, Pillai R, et al. Association of leukemia genetics with response to venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Am J Hematol, 2019, 94(10): E253-E255.

    [18]

    Nguyen LXT, Troadec E, Kalvala A, et al. The Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax inhibits Nrf2 antioxidant pathway activation induced by hypomethylating agents in AML[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2019, 234(8): 14040-14049. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28091

    [19]

    Suarez-Álvarez B, Rodríguez RM, Schlangen K, et al. Phenotypic characteristics of aged CD4+CD28null T lymphocytes are determined by changes in the whole-genome DNA methylation pattern[J]. Aging Cell, 2017, 16(2): 293-303. doi: 10.1111/acel.12552

    [20]

    Stubig T, Badbaran A, Luetkens T, et al. 5-Azacytidine Promotes an Inhibitory T-Cell Phenotype and Impairs Immune Mediated Antileukemic Activity[J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2014, 2014: 1-12.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2230
  • PDF下载数:  1770
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-02-11
刊出日期:  2022-07-01

目录