RUNX1突变急性髓系白血病的分子学特点分析

李青芸, 崔苗, 卢绪章, 等. RUNX1突变急性髓系白血病的分子学特点分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(7): 517-521. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.013
引用本文: 李青芸, 崔苗, 卢绪章, 等. RUNX1突变急性髓系白血病的分子学特点分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(7): 517-521. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.013
LI Qingyun, CUI Miao, LU Xuzhang, et al. Molecular characterization of RUNX1 gene mutation in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(7): 517-521. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.013
Citation: LI Qingyun, CUI Miao, LU Xuzhang, et al. Molecular characterization of RUNX1 gene mutation in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(7): 517-521. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.013

RUNX1突变急性髓系白血病的分子学特点分析

详细信息

Molecular characterization of RUNX1 gene mutation in acute myeloid leukemia

More Information
  • 目的 探讨RUNX1突变急性髓系白血病(AML)的分子学特点及其与部分临床参数的相关性。方法 采用高通量DNA测序技术联合PCR及Sanger测序法检测30例RUNX1突变AML患者与211例RUNX1野生型AML患者的50余种髓系肿瘤基因突变。结果 ① 与RUNX1野生型患者比较,RUNX1突变AML患者中M0亚型的比例更高(10.0% vs 0.9%,P< 0.05),细胞遗传学分组中预后良好组的比例更低(0 vs 15.9%,P< 0.05)。②RUNX1突变AML患者具有更高的SRSF2(6.7% vs 0,P< 0.05)突变发生率,更低的NPM1(3.3% vs 28.9%,P< 0.01)及CEBPA突变发生率(3.3% vs 21.3%,P< 0.05)。③30例RUNX1突变AML患者中90.0%伴有额外基因突变,与RUNX1野生型患者比较,RUNX1突变AML患者中具有2种基因突变的比例更低,≥3种以上基因突变的比例更高(P< 0.05)。④30例RUNX1突变AML患者中,与DNMT3A野生型患者比较,伴有DNMT3A突变的患者年龄更大,共存基因突变个数更多(P< 0.05)。⑤初次诱导化疗后,RUNX1突变及野生型AML患者的缓解率分别为53.3%及75.0%,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。结论 RUNX1突变AML患者具有独特的分子生物学特征,并与部分临床参数相关,完全缓解率明显降低。与RUNX1野生型患者比较,RUNX1突变AML患者在基因突变个数及突变谱系上有一定的差异。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  RUNX1突变型与野生型AML患者的临床特征比较

    临床特征 总数(241例) RUNX1突变型(30例) RUNX1野生型(211例) P
    性别/例(%) 0.826
       男 124(51.5) 16(53.3) 108(51.2)
       女 117(48.5) 14(46.7) 103(48.8)
    年龄/岁 44.5(30~54) 45.5(28~52) 44(30~54) 0.678
    白细胞计数/(×109· L-1) 15.8(5.6~54.9) 13.2(5.2~54.2) 18.8(5.6~55.8) 0.397
    血红蛋白/(g·L-1) 86.0(69.8~104.0) 88.0(70.5~106.0) 85.5(69.0~104.0) 0.763
    血小板计数/(×109· L-1) 50.0(27.0~77.3) 53.0(35.5~73.5) 49.0(26.5~78.5) 0.360
    细胞遗传学/例(%)
       预后良好 31(12.9) 0 31(14.7) 0.018
       预后中等 156(64.7) 22(73.3) 134(63.5) 0.435
       预后不良 37(15.4) 7(23.3) 30(14.2) 0.357
       资料缺失 17(7.1) 1(3.3) 16(7.6)
    +8/例(%) 16(6.6) 5(16.7) 11(5.2) 0.061
    FAB/例(%)
       M0 5(2.1) 3(10.0) 2(0.9) 0.015
       M1 11(4.6) 2(6.7) 9(4.3) 0.903
       M2 56(23.2) 5(16.7) 51(24.2) 0.363
       M4 29(12.0) 1(3.3) 28(13.3) 0.206
       M5 129(53.5) 19(63.3) 110(52.1) 0.250
       未能分型 11(4.6) 0 11(5.2)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  RUNX1突变伴FLT3-ITD及DNMT3A突变患者的临床特征比较

    临床特征 FLT3-ITD P DNMT3A P
    突变型(6例) 野生型(24例) 突变型(7例) 野生型(23例)
    年龄/岁 46.5(32~52) 28.5(23~50) 0.177 53(46~63) 37(27~48) 0.014
    白细胞计数/(×109·L-1) 22.0(5.0~77.7) 12.7(4.8~44.5) 0.455 7.0(2.1~40.5) 13.2(6.0~58.5) 0.408
    血红蛋白/(g·L-1) 91.5(72.3~116.8) 88.0(70.5~106.0) 0.846 82.5(68.0~116.8) 89.3(71.5~104.0) 1.000
    血小板计数/(×109·L-1) 53.0(48.5~150.5) 53.5(26.3~72.0) 0.434 68.5(45.3~105.8) 53.0(30.0~73.0) 0.265
    基因突变个数/种 3(3~5) 3(2~4) 0.521 4(4~6) 3(2~3) 0.001
    完全缓解/例(%) 4(66.7) 15(62.5) 1.000 2(28.6) 14(60.9) 0.204
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Sood R, Kamikubo Y, Liu P. Role of RUNX1 in hematological malignancies[J]. Blood, 2017, 129(15): 2070-2082. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-687830

    [2]

    Gaidzik VI, Teleanu V, Papaemmanuil E, et al. RUNX1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia are associated with distinct clinico-pathologic and genetic features[J]. Leukemia, 2016, 30(11): 2160-2168. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.126

    [3]

    Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia[J]. Blood, 2016, 127(20): 2391-2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544

    [4]

    陈琳, 魏旭东. 急性髓系白血病的微小残留病干预治疗[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2020, 33(3): 157-160. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=znUxuWmAUtc42Fbyaccm0nD7g0-gwJXLfHgN6jAPWOy_8mdmNVbiZDmWIvguVimukJUbU78wp96TMWjyBu-9tyE1lqR5FwnovPQZk06Uh6hIyiAG4Xi0_O06kOqxS-4-&uniplatform=NZKPT

    [5]

    秦伟, 晁红颖, 蔡晓辉, 等. 伴NPM1突变的老年急性髓系白血病患者的共存基因突变分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(40): 3152-3157. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.40.006

    [6]

    Li J, Jin W, Tan Y, et al. Distinct gene expression pattern of RUNX1 mutations coordinated by target repression and promoter hypermethylation in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Front Med, 2021 Dec 27. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0815-4.Onlineaheadofprint.

    [7]

    Bullinger L, Dohner K, Dohner H. Genomics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Diagnosis and Pathways[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(9): 934-946. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.2208

    [8]

    Haferlach T, Stengel A, Eckstein S, et al. The new provisional WHO entity 'RUNX1 mutated AML' shows specific genetics but no prognostic influence of dysplasia[J]. Leukemia, 2016, 30(10): 2109-2112. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.150

    [9]

    Tsai SC, Shih LY, Liang ST, et al. Biological Activities of RUNX1 Mutants Predict Secondary Acute Leukemia Transformation from Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2015, 21(15): 3541-3551. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2203

    [10]

    Wang K, Zhou F, Cai X, et al. Mutational landscape of patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes in the context of RUNX1 mutation[J]. Hematology, 2020, 25(1): 211-218. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2020.1765561

    [11]

    Stengel A, Kern W, Meggendorfer M, et al. Number of RUNX1 mutations, wild-type allele loss and additional mutations impact on prognosis in adult RUNX1-mutated AML[J]. Leukemia, 2018, 32(2): 295-302. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.239

    [12]

    Nguyen L, Zhang X, Roberts E, et al. Comparison of mutational profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with mutated RUNX1 versus acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes with mutated RUNX1[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2020, 61(6): 1395-1405. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1723016

    [13]

    Behrens K, Maul K, Tekin N, et al. RUNX1 cooperates with FLT3-ITD to induce leukemia[J]. J Exp Med, 2017, 214(3): 737-752. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160927

    [14]

    Tang JL, Hou HA, Chen CY, et al. AML1/RUNX1 mutations in 470 adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic implication and interaction with other gene alterations[J]. Blood, 2009, 114(26): 5352-5361. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-223784

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1079
  • PDF下载数:  784
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-12-04
刊出日期:  2022-07-01

目录