盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体用于淋巴瘤CAR-T治疗前桥接的安全性及疗效研究

吴佳, 李春蕊, 郑邈, 等. 盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体用于淋巴瘤CAR-T治疗前桥接的安全性及疗效研究[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2024, 37(9): 625-630. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.006
引用本文: 吴佳, 李春蕊, 郑邈, 等. 盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体用于淋巴瘤CAR-T治疗前桥接的安全性及疗效研究[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2024, 37(9): 625-630. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.006
WU Jia, LI Chunrui, ZHENG Miao, et al. Safety and efficacy study of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome for pre-treatment bridging of CAR-T therapy in lymphoma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2024, 37(9): 625-630. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.006
Citation: WU Jia, LI Chunrui, ZHENG Miao, et al. Safety and efficacy study of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome for pre-treatment bridging of CAR-T therapy in lymphoma[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2024, 37(9): 625-630. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.09.006

盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体用于淋巴瘤CAR-T治疗前桥接的安全性及疗效研究

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No:82170167)
详细信息

Safety and efficacy study of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome for pre-treatment bridging of CAR-T therapy in lymphoma

More Information
  • 目的 目前嵌合抗原受体T(chimeric antigen receptor-T,CAR-T)细胞疗法在复发/难治性淋巴瘤患者的治疗中取得了突破性疗效,桥接治疗作为CAR-T回输前原发病的控制方案与CAR-T疗法的成功输注及后期应答密切相关。本研究旨在通过回顾性研究评估盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体用于CAR-T前桥接方案对于淋巴瘤治疗的疗效及安全性影响,为临床实践方案提供更多选择和依据。方法 回顾性收集和分析2022年3月至2024年4月在我院应用包含盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体作为CAR-T回输前桥接方案的患者的临床资料。参照2014年Lugano修订版的淋巴瘤疗效评价标准、2018年美国移植和细胞治疗协会共识及CTCAE 5.0进行疗效评价和安全性分级;通过即时聚合酶链式反应测定的每微克基因组DNA的转基因拷贝数作为参数评估CAR-T细胞动力学。结果 共有12例复发/难治性淋巴瘤患者纳入研究,中位年龄为48.5(25.0~67.0)岁。9例(75.0%)患者为复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤,1例为霍奇金淋巴瘤,1例为伯基特淋巴瘤,1例为T淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤。11例(91.7%)患者临床分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期;8例(66.7%)患者淋巴瘤IPI评分≥3分;7例(58.3%)患者结外病灶数量≥2个;5例(41.7%)患者既往接受过≥3线治疗;8例(66.7%)患者为大包块/高肿瘤负荷。在CAR-T细胞输注后疗效可评估的11例患者中,总有效率为81.8%(9/11),完全缓解率为54.5%(6/11),部分缓解率为27.3%(3/11)。截至2024年4月30日,1年无进展生存率为50.0%,中位无进展生存期为10.42个月;1年总生存率为61.4%,中位总生存期未达到。CAR-T细胞治疗后,患者均未出现免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征及≥3级细胞因子释放综合征,≥3级的中性粒细胞减少发生率为100.0%,血小板减少发生率为91.7%,贫血发生率为91.7%,绝大多数患者(81.8%)在1个月内恢复到3级以下血液学毒性。结论 盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体用于CAR-T细胞治疗前桥接方案显示出良好的临床应答率,且严重细胞因子释放综合征(≥3级)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征发生率低,血液学毒性可控,是针对多种淋巴瘤(弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤、霍奇金淋巴瘤、伯基特淋巴瘤、T淋母细胞淋巴瘤),特别是具有大包块及高肿瘤负荷患者的CAR-T前桥接治疗的安全有效的选择。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  CAR-T细胞治疗后疗效评估

    图 2  影像学评估SPD变化水平(a)及CAR-T细胞动力学(b)

    表 1  12例患者的临床基线特征 例(%)

    临床特征 患者
    年龄/岁 48.5(25.0~67.0)
    性别
      男 6(50.0)
      女 6(50.0)
    病理亚型
      DLBCL 9(75.0)
      BL 1(8.3)
      HL 1(8.3)
      TLBL 1(8.3)
    ECOG评分
      0~1   6(50.0)
      2 6(50.0)
    遗传学异常
      二次/三次打击重排 1(8.3)
      TP53缺失/突变 2(16.7)
    临床分期
      Ⅰ~Ⅱ 1(8.3)
      Ⅲ~Ⅳ 11(91.7)
    IPI评分
      0~2 4(33.3)
      3~5 8(66.7)
    结外灶数量≥2个 7(58.3)
    大包块(≥7.5 cm) 4(33.3)
    MTV
      高MTV 4(33.3)
      低MTV 4(33.3)
      不详 4(33.3)
    既往治疗线数
      中位数 2(1.0~5.0)
      ≥3线 5(41.7)
    既往移植
      有 1(8.3)
      无 11(91.7)
    难治/复发
      原发难治 6(50.0)
      复发 6(50.0)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  12例患者的治疗方案

    例号 桥接方案 免疫治疗方案 CAR-T治疗靶点
    1 BiTE+Lipo-MIT CAR-T CD191-1
    2 Lipo-MIT ASCT+CRA-T CD19/CD201-3
    3 R-MINE ASCT+CRA-T CD19/CD201-3
    4 阿糖胞苷+维奈克拉+阿扎胞苷+Lipo-MIT CAR-T CD72
    5 Lipo-MIT ASCT+CRA-T CD193
    6 BV-MINE ASCT+CRA-T CD304
    7 R-MINE CAR-T CD19/CD225
    8 R-CMOP CAR-T CD19/CD201-2
    9 G+达雷妥尤单抗+地塞米松+Lipo-MIT ASCT+CRA-T CD19/CD201-3
    10 G-MINE CAR-T CD191-1
    11 MINE ASCT+CRA-T CD19/CD201-3
    12 Lipo-MIT CAR-T CD191-1
    BiTE:CD3-CD19双特异性抗体;R:利妥昔单抗;MINE:美司钠+异环磷酰胺+Lipo-MIT+依托泊苷;BV:维布妥昔单抗;CMOP:地塞米松+环磷酰胺+长春地辛+Lipo-MIT;G:奥妥珠单抗;ASCT:自体造血干细胞移植。1-1CD19单靶点CAR-T(ClinicalTrials,NCT05388695,队列1);1-3自体造血干细胞移植序贯CD19/CD20双靶点CAR-T(ClinicalTrials,NCT05388695,队列3);2CD7 CAR-T(ClinicalTrials,NCT05398614);3瑞基奥仑赛注射液;4自体造血干细胞移植序贯CD30 CAR-T(ClinicalTrials,ChiCTR2100053662);5CD19/CD22双靶点CAR-T(ClinicalTrials,ChiCTR2000038641);1-2CD19/CD20双靶点CAR-T(ClinicalTrials,NCT05388695,队列2)。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  CAR-T细胞治疗后不良反应发生情况

    CAR-T毒性 例数(%) 持续时间/d 持续≤1个月/例(%)
    CRS
      1级 4(33.3) 9.5(2~17) 4(100.0)
      2级 8(66.7) 14.5(4~51) 7(87.5)
    血液学毒性
      ≥3级中性粒细胞减少 12(100.0) 16.5(2~27) 12(100.0)
      ≥3级血小板减少 11(91.7) 16(3~86) 9(81.8)
      ≥3级贫血 11(91.7) 22(4~47) 9(81.8)
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    June CH, Sadelain M. Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(1): 64-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1706169

    [2]

    Elsallab M, Levine BL, Wayne AS, et al. CAR T-cell product performance in haematological malignancies before and after marketing authorisation[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(2): e104-e116. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30729-6

    [3]

    Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(1): 45-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980

    [4]

    Nastoupil LJ, Jain MD, Feng L, et al. Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(27): 3119-3128. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02104

    [5]

    Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(14): 1331-1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347

    [6]

    Sesques P, Ferrant E, Safar V, et al. Commercial anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphoma in a European center[J]. Am J Hematol, 2020, 95(11): 1324-1333. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25951

    [7]

    Duan Y, You T, Xu P, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of a Cmop±R Regimen for the Initial Treatment of Patients with NHL[C]. 65th ASH Annu Meet Abstr, 2023, 142: 6244.

    [8]

    Wang L, Cao J, Li C, et al. Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome injection in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, single-center, phase Ⅱ clinical trial[J]. Invest New Drugs, 2022, 40(2): 330-339. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01182-7

    [9]

    Cai Q, Xia Y, Wang L, et al. Combination of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome with Tislelizumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory NK/T Cell Lymphoma: A Phase Ib/Ⅱ Clinical Trial[C]. 65th ASH Annu Meet Abstr, 2023, 142: 4470.

    [10]

    Wang X, Ren J, Zhu H, et al. Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome Injection Combined with Carmustine, Etoposide, and Cytarabine As Conditioning of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in NHL Patients: a Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial[C]. 65th ASH Annu Meet Abstr, 2023, 142: 7062.

    [11]

    Song G, Wu H, Yoshino K, et al. Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of liposomal drugs[J]. J Liposome Res, 2012, 22(3): 177-192. doi: 10.3109/08982104.2012.655285

    [12]

    Zhang H, Sheng D, Han Z, et al. Doxorubicin-liposome combined with clodronate-liposome inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma through the depletion of macrophages and tumor cells[J]. Int J Pharm, 2022, 629: 122346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122346

    [13]

    赵倩, 王彩霞, 邱云良, 等. 盐酸米托蒽醌脂质体的药效学及毒性研究[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2011, 27(12): 4-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YAOL201112028.htm

    [14]

    Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms[J]. Leukemia, 2022, 36(7): 1703-1719. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1

    [15]

    Dean EA, Mhaskar RS, Lu H, et al. High metabolic tumor volume is associated with decreased efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Blood Adv, 2020, 4(14): 3268-3276. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001900

    [16]

    Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(27): 3059-3068. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800

    [17]

    Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, et al. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells[J]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2019, 25(4): 625-638. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758

    [18]

    Hines MR, Knight TE, McNerney KO, et al. Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-Like Syndrome[J]. Transplant Cell Ther, 2023, 29(7): 438. e1-438. e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.03.006

    [19]

    Iacoboni G, Simó M, Villacampa G, et al. Prognostic impact of total metabolic tumor volume in large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy[J]. Ann Hematol, 2021, 100(9): 2303-2310. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04560-6

    [20]

    Zhou L, Yu N, Li T, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of 16 relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancy patients with CAR T-cell-related hyperferritinaemia[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 912689. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912689

    [21]

    Hayden PJ, Roddie C, Bader P, et al. Management of adults and children receiving CAR T-cell therapy: 2021 best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation(EBMT)and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT(JACIE)and the European Haematology Association(EHA)[J]. Ann Oncol, 2022, 33(3): 259-275. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.12.003

    [22]

    Freyer CW, Porter DL. Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity following CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies[J]. J Allergy Clin Immuno, 2020, 146(5): 940-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.025

    [23]

    Pinnix CC, Gunther JR, Dabaja BS, et al. Bridging therapy prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Blood Adv, 2020, 4(13): 2871-2883. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001837

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  345
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-06-04
刊出日期:  2024-09-01

返回顶部

目录