Efficacy and safety of modified plasma exchange in treatment of adult patients with severe immune thrombocytopenic purpura
-
摘要: 目的:评估一种改良的血浆置换术在治疗成人重型免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)中的效果及其安全性。方法:对确诊的116例重型ITP患者随机分组进入A、B、C组,A组为改良的血浆置换术联合糖皮质激素43例患者,B组为传统的血浆置换术联合糖皮质激素37例患者,C组为单用糖皮质激素组治疗36例患者。ELISA法检测各组患者治疗前后血小板相关抗体,进行统计学分析;检测血小板计数、凝血功能、血浆蛋白水平变化,进行统计学分析,记录各组治疗期间发生不良反应情况,进行比较分析。结果:A组和B组患者在治疗前后血小板提升及血小板抗体水平下降,与C组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组与B组间比较,A组在提升血小板速度及幅度方面更佳,差异无统计学意义;A组在清除血小板相关抗体能力更强,二者间差异有统计学意义。A、B、C组患者治疗前后在凝血时间、血浆白蛋白、纤维蛋白原水平变化方面,差异无统计学意义;A组血浆球蛋白在治疗后较治疗前有明显下降,差异有统计学意义。A组患者置换后24h内浮肿、头晕、乏力症状发生率较B组有所升高,但A组过敏反应、发热反应等发生率较B组明显下降。结论:改良的血浆置换术联合糖皮质激素在治疗成人重型ITP中疗效明确,疗效优于单纯糖皮质激素及传统的血浆置换术;发生严重不良反应如过敏、发热较传统血浆置换降低,不受血浆供给限制,随时可以开展,可节约大量血浆。但有可能发生低血浆蛋白血症,尤其是低球蛋白血症,需要积极预防。
-
关键词:
- 血浆置换 /
- 免疫性血小板减少性紫癜 /
- 糖皮质激素
Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified plasma exchange in the treatment of adult patients with severe immune thrombocytopenic purpura(ITP).Method:One hundred and sixteen patients with severe ITP were randomly divided into different treatment groups.Forty-three cases of severe ITP patients were treated with modified plasma exchange combined with glucocorticoid(group A).Thirty-seven patients were treated with traditional plasma exchange combined with glucocorticoid(group B).Thirty-four patients were treated only with glucocorticoid(group C).Before and after treatment,platelet associated immunoglobulin,platelet count,coagulation function and plasma protein level were detected in each group,then statistical analysis was taken.Adverse reactions were recorded in each group during the treatment period,and comparative analysis was done.Result:Compared with group C,platelet associated immunoglobulin levels in group A and B decreased more lower,and the platelet counts were increased more quickly,the difference were statistically significant.There was significant differences between the group A and B in the rise speed of platelet count,and also in the level of platelet associated immunoglobulin,group A was better than group B.Before and after treatment,the difference was not statistically significant between three groups in the clotting time,plasma albumin and fibrinogen levels.The incidence of edema,dizziness and fatigue in group A was higher than those in the group B within 24 hours after replacement,but the incidence rate of allergic reaction and fever reaction was significantly lower than those in group B.Conclusion:The treatment of group A had a considerable effect.The effect was better than that of group B and C.Severe adverse reactions such as allergic reactions and fever in group A were significantly lower than those in group B.Modified plasma exchange could save the plasma.But the occurrence of low plasma protein,especially low serum albumin,should be actively prevented.-
Key words:
- plasma exchange /
- immune thrombocytopenic purpura /
- glucocorticoid
-
-
[1] 许多荣,陈惠珍,邹外一,等.一种新型血浆置换液在治疗高粘滞综合征中的应用[J].中国热带医学,2009,9(6):1083-1085.
[2] 葛均波,徐永健.内科学[M].8版.北京.人民卫生出版社,2013:624-625.
[3] 曾明,程樱,钱婷,等.血小板表面相关抗体检测对ITP的诊断作用研究[J].河北医药,2016,38(10):1494-1497.
[4] Sigdel MR,Shah DS,Kafle MP,et al.Severe immune thrombocytopenic purpura treated with plasma exchange[J].Kathmandu Univ Med J(KUMJ),2012,10:85-87.
[5] Welsh KJ,Bai Y.Therapeutic plasma exchange as a therapeutic modality for the treatment of IVIG complications[J].J Clin Apher,2015,30:371-374.
[6] 王丹,黄丽红,姚锡满,等.治疗性血浆置换术295例及其血浆使用情况分析[J].中国输血杂志,2013,26(8):712-715.
[7] Ohkubo A,Okado T,Kurashima N,et al.Removal characteristics of immunoglobulin G subclasses by conventional plasma exchange and selective plasma exchange[J].Ther Apher Dial,2015,19:361-366.
[8] 贾立明,进高梅,朱燕平,等.血浆置换在重症肌无力患者治疗中的应用效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(18):26-27.
[9] 张蔼玲,李颖玉,李永生,等.血浆置换与血浆免疫吸附治疗神经系统自身免疫性疾病的疗效及安全性[J].临床医学工程,2015,22(8):1032-1033.
[10] 王颖.血浆置换治疗格林巴利综合症的不良反应及护理[J].中华全科医学,2013,11(9):1443-1444.
[11] 黄东虹,严仲文.治疗性血浆置换不良反应调查分析[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2012,17(3):224-226.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 484
- PDF下载数: 200
- 施引文献: 0