Clinical value of multiple indicators combined in differential diagnosis of pleural and ascites
-
摘要: 目的:比较常规胸腹水检验指标在不同原因胸腹水患者中的表达水平差异,并探讨其鉴别诊断价值。方法:选取2013-10-2017-04住院患者606例,其中胸水461例(分为一般性胸水组176例,恶性胸水组152例,结核性胸水组133例),腹水145例(分为一般性腹水组80例,恶性腹水组63例,结核性腹水组2例),对所有患者胸腹水作总蛋白(TP)、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、葡萄糖(GLU)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、氯离子(CL)、C反应蛋白(CRP)检测和李凡他试验、细胞计数及分类等,并对检测结果进行统计学分析。结果:结核性胸水组TP、ADA、CRP、李凡他试验阳性率、单核细胞百分比和绝对值均显著高于其他原因的胸水组(均P<0.05),恶性胸水组血性比例显著高于其他组(P<0.05)。恶性腹水组TP、ADA、LDH、CRP、李凡他阳性率、血性比例均显著高于一般性腹水(均P<0.05),而GLU水平显著低于一般性腹水(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示包括ADA在内的多个指标可以用于鉴别诊断结核性胸水[ROC曲线下面积(AUC)均大于0.70],多指标的联合应用可以显著提高诊断效率(AUC达到0.946);而TP、LDH和CRP可用于鉴别诊断恶性腹水和一般性腹水,但单项和联合检测均价值有限(AUC仅稍大于0.70)。结论:多个常用实验室指标对胸腹水的鉴别诊断具有较好的价值,特别是通过多指标的联合应用可以显著提高结核性胸水的诊断效率。Abstract: Objective:To compare the difference of routine marker expression level in patients with different causes of hydrothorax and ascites,and to explore the value of differential diagnosis. Method:606 cases of hospitalized patients in Yingshan People's Hospital from October 2013 to April 2017 were enrolled,including 461 cases of hydrothorax(176 cases of general pleural effusion,152 cases of malignant pleural effusion,133 cases of tuberculous pleural effusion)and 145 cases of ascites(80 cases of general ascites,63 cases of malignant ascites,2 cases of tuberculous ascites).For the samples of hydrothorax and ascites,total protein(TP),adenosine deaminase(ADA),glucose(GLU),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),chloride(CL)and C reactive protein(CRP) were detected,and Rivalta test,cell counting and classification were made.The test results were statistically analyzed. Result:The level of TP,ADA,CRP,positive rate of Rivalta test and percentage and absolute counting of mononuclear cells in tuberculous pleural effusion group were significantly higher than those in other groups(all P<0.05),and the proportion of bloody pleural effusion in patients with malignant pleural effusion was significantly higher than that in other groups(P<0.05).The level of TP,ADA,LDH,CRP and positive rate of Rivalta test in malignant ascites were significantly higher than those in general ascites(all P<0.05),while glucose level was significantly lower than that in general ascites(P<0.05).The ROC curve showed a number of indicators including ADA could be used for differential diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion[The area under ROC curve(AUC)more than 0.70],and combined use with multi index could significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency(AUC was 0.946);while TP,LDH and CRP could be used for differential diagnosis of malignant ascites and general ascites,but single and combined use of different indicators were of limited value(AUC only slightly more than 0.70).Conclusion:Several commonly used laboratory indicators are valuable for differential diagnosis of pleural and ascitic fluid,especially through the combined application of multiple indicators,which can significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency of tuberculous pleural effusion.
-
[1] 黄胜,周丹,余继英,等.多项指标筛选鉴别诊断恶性与结核性胸腹水诊断价值[J].湖北民族学报,2012,29(2):14-15.
[2] 高国生,冯家飞,丁世雄.甲胎蛋白、铜蓝蛋白和触珠蛋白联合诊断原发性肝癌评价[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2011,21(12):2833-2834.
[3] 陈继红,陈丽君,许旺.联合测定胸水和血清ADA对结核性与癌性胸水的鉴别诊断价值[J].临床肺科杂志,2007,29(4):336-337.
[4] 边召允,蔡高清.腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)和唾液酸(SA)联合检测在胸腹水中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(16):567-568.
[5] 邬晓薇,邹晓薇,吴丽娟,等.乳酸脱氢酶、腺苷脱氨酶在胸腹水酶学检测中的临床应用[J].重庆医学,2008,37(3):260-261.
[6] 子建文,赵黎明.腺苷脱氨酶、乳酸脱氢酶和CRP应用于胸腹水常规检测的价值[J].西南军医,2011,13(2):252-253.
[7] 丁红,迟锦瑜,朱星成.五项生化指标对结核及恶性胸腹水鉴别的探讨[J].医药前沿,2015,5(18):172-173.
[8] 韩娟,华文龙.乳酸脱氢酶、CRP和腺苷脱氨酶应用于胸腹水常规检测作用探讨[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2014,14(25):37-37,39.
[9] Tsao YS,Cardoso AG,Condon RG,et al.Monitoring Chinese hamster ovary cell culture by the analysis of glucose and lactate metabolism[J].J Biotechnol,2005,118:316-327.
[10] Tay TR,Tee A.Factors affecting pleural fluid adenosine deaminase level and the implication on the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion:a retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Infect Dis,2013,13:546-546.
计量
- 文章访问数: 114
- PDF下载数: 325
- 施引文献: 0