-
摘要: 目的:建立一种简单有效、可在一般实验室使用的放散试验质控方法。方法:采用供者直接抗人球蛋白试验阴性、自身对照阴性、无免疫史的O型RhD阳性压积红细胞制备放散试验的阴性对照。采用不同稀释倍数的单克隆IgG型抗-D致敏O型RhD阳性红细胞制备强阳性、弱阳性2个梯度的放散试验阳性对照。采用正交试验原理摸索制备阳性对照的最佳制备条件。评价该质控方法对酸、热放散2种常用方法的适用性。结果:筛选到未致敏的O型RhD阳性压积红细胞作为放散试验的阴性对照。强阳性对照的最佳制备条件:200 μL未致敏的O型RhD阳性压积红细胞与25 μL的单克隆IgG型抗-D原液在37℃孵育1 min。弱阳性对照的最佳制备条件:200 μL未致敏的O型RhD阳性压积红细胞与等体积的256倍稀释的单克隆IgG型抗-D在37℃孵育1 min。该质控方法只适用于酸放散,不适用于热放散。结论:成功建立了适用于酸放散的室内质控方法。Abstract: Objective: To establish a simple and effective internal control strategy for elution test in general laboratories.Method: The negative control of elution test was prepared by O/RhD-positive packed red cells which were direct antiglobulin test negative,self-control negative and from donors without immune history.Two levels of positive controls were processed by different concentrations of IgG anti-D reagent.The optimal conditions for the preparation of positive controls were determined through orthogonal tests.And the internal control strategy was evaluated for both acid elution and thermal elution test.Result: The negative control of elution test was successfully obtained with non-sensitized O/RhD-positive packed red cells.The optimal conditions of strong positive control,200 μL non-sensitized O/RhD-positive packed red cells were well incubated with 25 μL IgG anti-D reagent at 37℃ for 1 min.The optimal conditions of weakly positive control,200 μL non-sensitized O/RhD-positive packed red cells were well incubated with 200 μL diluted IgG anti-D reagent (dilution at a ratio of 1[BFZ]:256) at 37℃ for 1 min.Our quality control method was applicable only to acid elution test,but not thermal elution test.Conclusion: An internal quality control strategy is successfully established for acid elution test.
-
Key words:
- internal quality control /
- elution test /
- self-made controls
-
-
[1] 郑妍,王文婷,穆士杰,等.输血相容性检测试验室内质控品的制备与可行性分析[J].临床血液学杂志,2017,30(4):577-581,586.
[2] 邱玉霞,李志平,孔莉娜,等.自制弱阳性质控品对无偿献血者进行ABO血型鉴定室内质控的可行性探讨[J].中国当代医药,2014,21(21):120-123.
[3] 马印图,王更银,李玉秋,等.微柱凝胶技术检测血型抗体IgG亚型试验方法的建立[J].临床血液学杂志,2018,31(2):253-256.
[4] 郑凌,刘衍春,吴敏慧,等.Gly-HCl/EDTA放散法与56℃热放散法的试验比较[J].临床血液学杂志,2012,25(1):118-120.
[5] 李静,陈保民.4种放散方法解离免疫球蛋白G抗体效果比较[J].检验医学与临床,2015,12(13):1947-1949.
[6] 刘玉敏.RhD新生儿溶血病D抗原遮蔽的实验室诊断及治疗效果的观察[J].临床血液学杂志,2019,32(4):590-593.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 225
- PDF下载数: 228
- 施引文献: 0
下载: