BD BACTEC<sup>TM</sup>FX全自动细菌培养仪用于血液细菌检测室间质量评价分析

石洁; 贾璐; 徐安琪

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2021.06.014

BD BACTEC^TMFX全自动细菌培养仪用于血液细菌检测室间质量评价分析

- 南京红十字血液中心(南京, 210003)

详细信息

通讯作者: 徐安琪,E-mail:545521287@qq.com

中图分类号: R457.1

收稿日期: 2020-11-24

External quality assessment of blood bacterial testing results by using BD BACTEC^TMFX automatic bacterial culture instrument

- Nanjing Red Cross Blood Center, Nanjing, 210003, China

More Information

Corresponding author: XU Anqi, E-mail: 545521287@qq.com

Received Date: 24 November 2020

摘要

摘要: 目的:分析BD BACTEC^TMFX全自动细菌培养仪用于血液产品无菌试验的检测结果,并进行室间质量评价。方法:回顾性分析血站质量控制实验室2017—2019年血液产品无菌培养的结果,以及参加2019年中国国际输血感染预防和控制项目组(CITIC)血站细菌检测室间质量评价项目的数据。结果:2年间共检测血小板、血浆、红细胞等血液成分标本2028份,总阳性率为0.25%(5/2028),其中病毒灭活冰冻血浆占60%(3/5)。2019年能力验证结果的总符合率为92.86%(26/28)。结论:全自动细菌培养仪用于血液无菌检测并积极参加能力验证有利于提高检测结果的准确性和可靠性,评估试验人员能力。
- 全自动细菌培养仪 /
- 细菌检测 /
- 室间质量评价
Abstract: Objective: To analysis the external quality evaluation of terial testing results using BD BACTEC^TMFX automatic bacterial culture instrument.Methods: The bacterial testing results from 2017 to 2019 for the quality control laboratory of blood station, and the data of 2019 China International Transfusion Infection Prevention and Control Project Group(CITIC) bacterial testing external quality evaluation project for blood station were retrospectively analyzed.Results: There were 2028 tested samples of blood components such as platelets, plasma, and red blood cells. Totally the positive rate was 0.25%(5/2028), and frozen plasma with methylene blue virus inactivation accounted for 60%(3/5). For the 28 specimens detection results of 2019 CITIC, the total compliance rate was 92.86%(26/28).Conclusion: Automatic bacterial culture instrument used for blood bacterial testing and actively participating in proficiency testing would improve the accuracy and reliability of test results and help to evaluate the ability of test personnel.
- BD BACTEC^TMFX /
- bacterial testing /
- external quality assessment

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

[1]	冯晨晨,周静宇,纪云鹏,等.2015-2016年江苏地区采供血机构血液成分细菌检测室间质评结果回顾性分析[J].中国输血杂志,2017,30(4):433-435.
[2]	朱立苇,王拥军,孟忠华,等.CITIC细菌检测室间质量评价及细菌检测质量影响因素分析[J].中国输血杂志,2014,27(11):1110-1112.
[3]	徐忠,邱颖婕,陈琦,等.14923例单采血小板细菌检测结果分析[J].中国输血杂志,2016,29(9):974-976.
[4]	邱颖婕,冯佳,周筱嫣,等.17家采供血机构血液成分细菌检测室间质评结果分析[J].中国输血杂志,2015,28(11):1413-1415.
[5]	李东,管改弟,刘文.CITIC血液成分细菌检测室间质评结果回顾性分析[J].临床医药实践,2020,29(5):361-363.
[6]	孙晓红,池子强,张卫,等.2016年参加CITIC细菌检测室间质量评价总结分析[J].河北医药,2018,40(18):2851-2853.
[7]	陈云光.参加CITIC血液成分细菌检测室间质评结果回顾性分析[J].中国输血杂志,2018,31(9):1077-1079.
[8]	覃柳燕.CITIC室间质评结果不吻合标本的再检及异常原因分析[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(19):2853-2855.
[9]	陈新,纪云鹏,王泰瑞,等.2016-2017年江苏省采供血机构细菌检测室间质评回顾性分析[J].江苏预防医学,2019,30(5):582-583.
[10]	Chetouane Y,Gallian P,Chetouane K,et al.Comparing two blood culture systems for the detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates[J].Transfusion,2018,58(11):2604-2610.
[11]	张燕,方建华,金新莉,等.无偿献血者单采血小板细菌检测结果分析[J].临床血液学杂志,2019,32(6):450-452.