异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒再激活的危险因素分析

郑晓燕, 刘哲, 王晓宁, 等. 异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒再激活的危险因素分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2024, 37(5): 339-342. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.05.010
引用本文: 郑晓燕, 刘哲, 王晓宁, 等. 异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒再激活的危险因素分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2024, 37(5): 339-342. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.05.010
ZHENG Xiaoyan, LIU Zhe, WANG Xiaoning, et al. Risk factors analysis of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2024, 37(5): 339-342. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.05.010
Citation: ZHENG Xiaoyan, LIU Zhe, WANG Xiaoning, et al. Risk factors analysis of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2024, 37(5): 339-342. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2024.05.010

异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒再激活的危险因素分析

  • 基金项目:
    陕西省重点研发计划一般项目(No:2022SF-051)
详细信息

Risk factors analysis of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

More Information
  • 目的 分析血液病患者行异基因造血干细胞移植后发生巨细胞病毒(cytomegalovirus,CMV)再激活的危险因素及抗病毒治疗的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2020年9月至2022年3月我院血液内科接受异基因造血干细胞移植的患者共145例。结果 移植后CMV再激活率为60.7%(88/145),移植前供者CMV IgG阳性率为97.2%(138/142),3例供者数据缺失;受者CMV IgG阳性率为99.3%(144/145),移植前供受者CMV IgG水平对移植后CMV的激活无明显影响。含抗胸腺细胞球蛋白方案(125例)与不含抗胸腺细胞球蛋白方案(20例)移植受者CMV再激活率分别为63.2%(79/125)和45.0%(9/20),差异无统计学意义(P=0.374)。中性粒细胞重建的中位时间为10(8~19) d,与CMV激活无明显关系。移植后急性移植物抗宿主病(acute graft versus host disease,aGVHD)的发生率为46.2%(67/145),主要表现为皮肤、肠道及肝脏损害。aGVHD患者CMV再激活率为74.6%(50/67),明显高于未发生aGVHD患者的48.7%(38/78)(P=0.004)。抗病毒治疗2个月后复测CMV转阴率为81.8%(72/88)。结论 CMV再激活是造血干细胞移植患者常见的并发症;移植后CMV再激活与合并aGVHD有一定的相关性;大多数CMV再激活患者对抗病毒治疗有效。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  移植后患者CMV感染情况受其他因素影响的单因素和多因素回归分析

    变量名 单因素回归 多因素回归
    OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
    性别
        女 参照组
        男 0.931 0.445~1.945 0.848 0.991 0.429~2.292 0.983
    年龄
        18岁以下 参照组
        18~45岁 0.737 0.211~2.571 0.632 0.796 0.213~2.996 0.733
        45岁及以上 0.519 0.136~1.971 0.335 0.622 0.150~2.578 0.513
    是否全相合
        否 参照组
        是 0.527 0.236~1.174 0.117 0.535 0.174~1.650 0.277
    是含ATG方案
        否 参照组
        是 2.099 0.809~5.444 0.127 1.663 0.542~5.103 0.374
    是否有aGVHD
        否 参照组
        是 3.096 1.527~6.279 0.002 2.909 1.412~5.993 0.004
    供受关系
        同辈 参照组
        隔辈 0.942 0.483~1.835 0.860 0.613 0.254~1.480 0.277
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    戴文露, 李春雨, 高艳林, 等. 供者CMV和EBV血清学状态对异基因造血干细胞移植患者临床预后的影响[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(7): 479-485. https://lcxy.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2022.07.006

    [2]

    Ljungman P, de la Camara R, Robin C, et al. Guidelines for the management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with haematological malignancies and after stem cell transplantation from the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia(ECIL 7)[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2019, 19(8): e260-e272. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30107-0

    [3]

    Karantoni E, Zavras PD, Su Y, et al. Outcomes of Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection in the First Year after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation[J]. Transplant Cell Ther, 2022, 28(7): 403. e1-403. e7.

    [4]

    Ruan Y, Luo T, Liu Q, et al. Features of cytomegalovirus infection and evaluation of cytomegalovirus-specific T cells therapy in children's patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective single-center study[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12: 1027341. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1027341

    [5]

    Giménez E, Torres I, Albert E, et al. Cytomegalovirus(CMV)infection and risk of mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(Allo-HSCT): A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis[J]. Am J Transplant, 2019, 19(9): 2479-2494. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15515

    [6]

    Kaito S, Nakajima Y, Hara K, et al. Heterogeneous impact of cytomegalovirus reactivation on nonrelapse mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Blood Adv, 2020, 4(6): 1051-1061. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000814

    [7]

    Kabut T, Weinbergerová B, Folber F, et al. High-dose aciclovir in CMV infection prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT: a single-center long-term experience[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2023, 58(11): 1229-1236. doi: 10.1038/s41409-023-02081-6

    [8]

    Ljungman P, Perez-Bercoff L, Jonsson J, et al. Risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation[J]. Haematologica, 2006, 91(1): 78-83.

    [9]

    Goldsmith SR, Abid MB, Auletta JJ, et al. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide is associated with increased cytomegalovirus infection: a CIBMTR analysis[J]. Blood, 2021, 137(23): 3291-3305. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009362

    [10]

    Schmidt-Hieber M, Tridello G, Ljungman P, et al. The prognostic impact of the cytomegalovirus serostatus in patients with chronic hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a report from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of EBMT[J]. Ann Hematol, 2019, 98(7): 1755-1763. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03669-z

    [11]

    Turki AT, Tsachakis-Muck N, Leserer S, et al. Impact of CMV reactivation on relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after HCT is dependent on disease stage and ATG[J]. Blood Adv, 2022, 6(1): 28-36. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005509

    [12]

    Duan Z, Zhang X, Liu Y, et al. Risk factors and survival of refractory cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation[J]. J Glob Antimicrob Resist, 2022, 31: 279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.10.009

    [13]

    上官思雨, 惠卉, 余浩源, 等. 异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒感染的危险因素分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2023, 36(5): 349-353. https://lcxy.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2023.05.010

    [14]

    Luo XH, Zhu Y, Chen YT, et al. CMV Infection and CMV-Specific Immune Reconstitution Following Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: An Update[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 732826. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.732826

    [15]

    Makanga DR, Guillaume T, Willem C, et al. Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide and Antithymocyte Globulin versus Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Haploidentical Transplants: Comparison of T Cell and NK Effector Reconstitution[J]. J Immunol, 2020, 205(5): 1441-1448. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000578

    [16]

    Yi ES, Lee JW, Kim YJ, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of cytomegalovirus infection in children post cord blood transplantation with focus on impact of graft-versus-host disease and immunosuppressants[J]. Ann Hematol, 2022, 101(2): 409-419. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04707-5

    [17]

    Mori Y, Jinnouchi F, Takenaka K, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic letermovir for cytomegalovirus reactivation in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a multicenter real-world data[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2021, 56(4): 853-862. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01082-z

    [18]

    Koch K, Osswald L, Miller I, et al. Letermovir Prophylaxis for CMV Reactivation in Allogeneic Stem Cell Recipients: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis[J]. Anticancer Res, 2022, 42(11): 5431-5441. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16047

    [19]

    Pei XY, Liu XF, Zhao XY, et al. Comparable anti-CMV responses of transplant donor and third-party CMV-specific T cells for treatment of CMV infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation[J]. Cell Mol Immunol, 2022, 19(4): 482-491. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00829-y

    [20]

    Wang X, Yu U, Yang C, et al. Cytomegalovirus(CMV)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy resolve CMV diseases and refractory CMV infections in paediatric recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2022, 57(2): 271-275. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01499-0

    [21]

    Fabrizio VA, Rodriguez-Sanchez MI, Mauguen A, et al. Adoptive therapy with CMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes depends on baseline CD4+ immunity to mediate durable responses[J]. Blood Adv, 2021, 5(2): 496-503. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002735

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  208
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-10-10
刊出日期:  2024-05-01

返回顶部

目录