2种血细胞分离机进行双份血小板采集比较

徐丽娟; 蒋奔; 宁一明; 王全立

2种血细胞分离机进行双份血小板采集比较

- 解放军第307医院输血科(北京, 100071)

详细信息

通讯作者: 王全立,E-mail:wangql77@yahoo.com.cn

中图分类号: R558

收稿日期: 2012-12-28

Two kinds of blood cell separator machine double comparison platelet collection

- Department of Blood Transfusion, 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100071, China

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Quanli, E-mail: wangql77@yahoo.com.cn

Received Date: 28 December 2012

摘要

摘要: 目的：评估Amicus3.2版本软件，比较Amicus与Trima采集双份血小板的时间。方法：平均分配献血员，保证献血员条件无差异情况下统计Amicus和Trima双份血小板采集时间。结果：在产品和产量抽样均合格，平均体重、身高、采前血小板计数均差异无统计学意义的前提下，平均采集时间差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：Amicus3.2版本软件缩短了双份血小板的程序时间，Amicus3.2版本采集时间上优于Trima。
- 血细胞分离机 /
- 血小板 /
- 采集时间
Abstract: Objective: Evaluation of Amicus3.2 software,to compare double-dose platelet collection procedure time on Amicus versus Trima.Method: Break donors into two groups evenly by weight,height,and preapheresis platelet count,to evaluate double-dose platelet collection procedure time on Amicus and Trima.Result: All the platelet product yield passed QC screening test.There was significant difference (P<0.05) between Amicus and Trima double-dose collection time,at the same donor group with same average weight,height,and preapheresis platelet count.Conclusion: Amicus3.2 improves platelet apheresis collection speed and it is faster than Trima on double dose platelet collection.
- blood separator /
- platelet /
- collection time

HTML全文

参考文献(2)

[1]

BURGSTALER E A,WINTERS J L,PINEDA A A.Paired comparison of Gambro Trima Accel versus Baxter Amicus single-needle platelet pheresis[J].Transfusion,2004,44:1612-1620.

[2]

冯学胜,邵春燕.五种血细胞分离机采集双剂量血小板的比较[J].继续医学教育,22(3):146-146.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计